Marginal diversity analysis of conservation of Chinese domestic duck breeds

被引:12
作者
Zhang, Yang [1 ]
Wang, Laidi [1 ]
Bian, Youqing [2 ]
Wang, Zhaoshan [3 ]
Xu, Qi [1 ]
Chang, Guobin [1 ]
Chen, Guohong [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Sci Tech Demonstrat Garden Modern Anim Hu, Taizhou 225300, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Eco Food Co Ltd, Suqian 223600, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ANIMAL GENETIC-RESOURCES; CATTLE BREEDS; EXTINCTION PROBABILITIES; SHEEP; POPULATION; PRIORITIES; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-019-49652-6
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the genetic diversity of Chinese domestic duck breeds and ensure the most effective allocation and usage of conservation funds. We first performed an analysis of DNA genetic distance in 21 duck breeds by measuring short tandem repeats. Then, we calculated the extinction probability, contribution rate, and marginal diversity for each breed. The results showed that the extinction rate of the Zhongshan duck, Guangxi duck, and Ji'an duck were the highest at 0.67, 0.59, and 0.59, respectively, and that of the Linwu duck, Jinding duck, and Gaoyou duck were the lowest at 0.15, 0.18, and 0.19, respectively. The current diversity of populations was 7.72 and the expected diversity in five hundred years is 5.14 +/- 1.15. The marginal diversity of the Chinese Muscovy duck was the largest (-2.20), accounting for 42.61% of the expected diversity, followed by the Guangxi duck (-0.49, 9.44%), whereas the Jinding duck was the smallest (-0.12; 2.32%). The protection potency of the Chinese Muscovy duck was the largest (0.61), followed by Guangxi duck (0.29), whereas the Jinding duck was the smallest (0.02). This study provides a reference for determining the conservation priority of Chinese domestic duck breeds or genetic resources.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Animal genetic resources and sustainable livelihoods
    Anderson, S
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 45 (03) : 331 - 339
  • [2] Barker J. S. F., 1994, CONSERV GENET, V68, P15
  • [3] Estimation of breed contributions to present and future genetic diversity of 44 North Eurasian cattle breeds using core set diversity measures
    Bennewitz, J
    Kantanen, J
    Tapio, I
    Li, MH
    Kalm, E
    Vilkki, J
    Ammosov, I
    Ivanova, Z
    Kiselyova, T
    Popov, R
    Meuwissen, THE
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2006, 38 (02) : 201 - 220
  • [4] Estimation of extinction probabilities of five German cattle breeds by population viability analysis
    Bennewitz, J
    Meuwissen, THE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2005, 88 (08) : 2949 - 2961
  • [5] STR data for PowerPlex®16 system from Buenos Aires population, Argentina
    Berardi, G
    Toscanini, U
    Raimondi, E
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 134 (2-3) : 222 - 224
  • [6] Bayesian estimation of speciation and extinction probabilities from (in)complete phylogenies
    Bokma, Folmer
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2008, 62 (09) : 2441 - 2445
  • [7] Cañón J, 2001, GENET SEL EVOL, V33, P311, DOI 10.1051/gse:2001121
  • [8] The genetic diversity and structure of 18 sheep breeds exposed to isolation and selection
    Curkovic, M.
    Ramljak, J.
    Ivankovic, S.
    Mioc, B.
    Ivankovic, A.
    Pavic, V.
    Brka, M.
    Veit-Kensch, C.
    Medugorac, I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2016, 133 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [9] Feng W., 1997, ACTA VET ZOOTECH SIN, V28, P4
  • [10] Combining inter- and intrapopulation information with the Weitzman approach to diversity conservation
    García, D
    Corral, N
    Cañón, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 2005, 96 (06) : 704 - 712