The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:43
作者
Song, Jie [1 ]
Gao, Yuan [2 ]
Yin, Pengbin [3 ]
Li, Yi [1 ]
Li, Yang [2 ]
Zhang, Jie [4 ]
Su, Qingqing [1 ]
Fu, Xiaojie [2 ]
Pi, Hongying [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese PLA, Med Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 4, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 6, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Serv Training Ctr, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
关键词
pressure ulcer; adverse event; machine learning; risk management; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; INJURY; PREVENTION; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.2147/RMHP.S297838
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Build machine learning models for predicting pressure ulcer nursing adverse event, and find an optimal model that predicts the occurrence of pressure ulcer accurately. Patients and Methods: Retrospectively enrolled 5814 patients, of which 1673 suffer from pressure ulcer events. Support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to construct the pressure ulcer prediction models, respectively. A total of 19 variables are included, and the importance of screening variables is evaluated. Meanwhile, the performance of the prediction models is evaluated and compared. Results: The experimental results show that the four pressure ulcer prediction models all achieve good performance. Also, the AUC values of the four models are all greater than 0.95. Besides, the comparison of the four models indicates that RF model achieves a higher accuracy for the prediction of pressure ulcer. Conclusion: This research verifies the feasibility of developing a management system for predicting nursing adverse event based on big data technology and machine learning technology. The random forest and decision tree model are more suitable for constructing a pressure ulcer prediction model. This study provides a reference for future pressure ulcer risk warning based on big data.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1187
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   PREDICTING PRESSURE INJURY IN CRITICAL CARE PATIENTS: A MACHIN E-LEARNING MODEL [J].
Alderden, Jenny ;
Pepper, Ginette Alyce ;
Wilson, Andrew ;
Whitney, Joanne D. ;
Richardson, Stephanie ;
Butcher, Ryan ;
Jo, Yeonjung ;
Cummins, Mollie Rebecca .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 27 (06) :461-468
[2]   A prediction tool for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers among surgical patients: Surgical pressure ulcer risk score [J].
Aloweni, Fazila ;
Ang, Shin Yuh ;
Fook-Chong, Stephanie ;
Agus, Nurliyana ;
Yong, Patricia ;
Goh, Meh Meh ;
Tucker-Kellogg, Lisa ;
Soh, Rick Chai .
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2019, 16 (01) :164-175
[3]  
Benin Andrea L, 2016, J Healthc Risk Manag, V36, P10, DOI 10.1002/jhrm.21237
[4]   The effect of a pressure ulcer prevention program and the bowel management system in reducing pressure ulcer prevalence in an ICU setting [J].
Benoit, Richard A., Jr. ;
Watts, Carolyn .
JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2007, 34 (02) :163-175
[5]   RISK-FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRESSURE SORES IN HOSPITALIZED ELDERLY PATIENTS - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
BIANCHETTI, A ;
ZANETTI, O ;
ROZZINI, R ;
TRABUCCHI, M .
ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 1993, 16 (03) :225-232
[6]   Prevalence of pressure ulcer and associated risk factors in middle- and older-aged medical inpatients in Norway [J].
Borsting, Tove E. ;
Tvedt, Christine R. ;
Skogestad, Ingrid J. ;
Granheim, Tove I. ;
Gay, Caryl L. ;
Lerdal, Anners .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (3-4) :e535-e543
[7]   The prevalence of pain at pressure areas and pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients [J].
Briggs M. ;
Collinson M. ;
Wilson L. ;
Rivers C. ;
McGinnis E. ;
Dealey C. ;
Brown J. ;
Coleman S. ;
Stubbs N. ;
Stevenson R. ;
Nelson E.A. ;
Nixon J. .
BMC Nursing, 12 (1)
[8]   Turning and Repositioning the Critically Ill Patient With Hemodynamic Instability A Literature Review and Consensus Recommendations [J].
Brindle, C. Tod ;
Malhotra, Rajiv ;
O'Rourke, Shelby ;
Currie, Linda ;
Chadwik, Debbie ;
Falls, Pam ;
Adams, Christi ;
Swenson, Jacob ;
Tuason, Dhol ;
Watson, Stephanie ;
Creehan, Sue .
JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2013, 40 (03) :254-267
[9]   Machine Learning for the Prediction of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus during 5-Year Follow-up in Non-Diabetic Patients with Cardiovascular Risks [J].
Choi, Byoung Geol ;
Rha, Seung-Woon ;
Kim, Suhng Wook ;
Kang, Jun Hyuk ;
Park, Ji Young ;
Noh, Yung-Kyun .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (02) :191-199
[10]   Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System Revised Pressure Injury Staging System [J].
Edsberg, Laura E. ;
Black, Joyce M. ;
Goldberg, Margaret ;
McNichol, Laurie ;
Moore, Lynn ;
Sieggreen, Mary .
JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2016, 43 (06) :585-597