Interlaboratory comparability of serum cotinine measurements at smoker and nonsmoker concentration levels: A round-robin study

被引:65
作者
Bernert, John T. [1 ]
Jacob, Peyton, III [2 ]
Holiday, David B. [3 ]
Benowitz, Neal L. [2 ]
Sosnoff, Connie S. [1 ]
Doig, Mira V. [4 ]
Feyerabend, Colin [4 ]
Aldous, Kenneth M. [5 ]
Sharifi, Mehran [6 ]
Kellogg, Mark D. [7 ]
Langman, Loralie J. [8 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Sci Lab, Natl Ctr Environm Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] RTI Int, Atlanta Reg Off, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] ABS Labs Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, Herts, England
[5] New York State Dept Hlth, Biggs Lab, Wadsworth Ctr, Albany, NY 12237 USA
[6] LabStat Int ULC, Kitchener, ON, Canada
[7] Childrens Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Rochester, MN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
NICOTINE; POPULATION; EXPOSURE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1093/ntr/ntp161
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Cotinine, the primary proximate metabolite of nicotine, is commonly measured as an index of exposure to tobacco in both active users of tobacco and nonsmokers with possible exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS). A number of laboratories have implemented analyses for measuring serum cotinine in recent years, but there have been few interlaboratory comparisons of the results. Among nonsmokers exposed to SHS, the concentration of cotinine in blood can be quite low, and extensive variability in these measurements has been reported in the past. In this study, a group of seven laboratories, all experienced in serum cotinine analysis, measured eight coded serum pools with concentrations ranging from background levels of about 0.05 ng/ml to relatively high concentrations in the active smokers range. All laboratories used either gas-liquid chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection or liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. All seven laboratories reliably measured the cotinine concentrations in samples that were within the range of their methods. In each case, the results for the pools were correctly ranked in order, and no significant interlaboratory bias was observed at the 5% level of significance for results from any of the pools. We conclude that present methods of chromatographic analysis of serum cotinine, as used by these experienced laboratories, are capable of providing accurate and precise results in both the smoker and the nonsmoker concentration range.
引用
收藏
页码:1458 / 1466
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Accuracy trueness and precision of measurement methods and results
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, ISO 5725-2 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method
[3]   Optimal Serum Cotinine Levels for Distinguishing Cigarette Smokers and Nonsmokers Within Different Racial/Ethnic Groups in the United States Between 1999 and 2004 [J].
Benowitz, Neal L. ;
Bernert, John T. ;
Caraballo, Ralph S. ;
Holiday, David B. ;
Wang, Jiantong .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 169 (02) :236-248
[4]   Cotinine as a biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure [J].
Benowitz, NL .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 1996, 18 (02) :188-204
[5]   DETERMINATION OF NICOTINE AND COTININE IN HUMAN-SERUM AND URINE - AN INTERLABORATORY STUDY [J].
BIBER, A ;
SCHERER, G ;
HOEPFNER, I ;
ADLKOFER, F ;
HELLER, WD ;
HADDOW, JE ;
KNIGHT, GJ .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1987, 35 (01) :45-52
[6]   Trends in environmental tobacco smoke restrictions in the home in Victoria, Australia [J].
Borland, R ;
Mullins, R ;
Trotter, L ;
White, V .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 1999, 8 (03) :266-271
[7]  
Department of Health and Human Services, 2006, HLTH CONS INV EXP TO
[8]  
GILMORE J, 2002, 82F0077XIE STAT CAN
[9]  
HARIHARAN M, 1988, CLIN CHEM, V34, P724
[10]  
International Organization for Standardization, 1994, 57254 ISO