What matters most to patients with severe aortic stenosis when choosing treatment? Framing the conversation for shared decision making

被引:8
作者
Col, Nananda F. [1 ,2 ]
Otero, Diana M. [3 ]
Lindman, Brian R. [4 ]
Horne, Aaron [5 ]
Levack, Melissa M. [6 ]
Ngo, Long [7 ]
Goodloe, Kimberly
Strong, Susan [8 ]
Kaplan, Elvin
Beaudry, Melissa [9 ]
Coylewright, Megan [10 ]
机构
[1] Shared Decis Making Resources, Georgetown, ME 04548 USA
[2] Univ New England, Biddeford, ME 04005 USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Sch Med, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Struct Heart & Valve Ctr, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Med City North Hills, North Richland Hills, TX USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Cardiac Surg, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[8] Heart Valve Voice US, Washington, DC USA
[9] Cent Vermont Med Ctr, Berlin, VT USA
[10] Erlanger Heart & Lung Inst, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Chattanooga, TN USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 08期
关键词
RACIAL DISPARITIES; VALVE-REPLACEMENT; CARE; PREFERENCES; IMPLANTATION; EXPERIENCES; OUTCOMES; CHOICE; TAVR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0270209
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundGuidelines recommend including the patient's values and preferences when choosing treatment for severe aortic stenosis (sAS). However, little is known about what matters most to patients as they develop treatment preferences. Our objective was to identify, prioritize, and organize patient-reported goals and features of treatment for sAS.MethodsThis multi-center mixed-methods study conducted structured focus groups using the nominal group technique to identify patients' most important treatment goals and features. Patients separately rated and grouped those items using card sorting techniques. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses generated a cognitive map and clusters.Results51 adults with sAS and 3 caregivers with experience choosing treatment (age 36-92 years) were included. Participants were referred from multiple health centers across the U.S. and online. Eight nominal group meetings generated 32 unique treatment goals and 46 treatment features, which were grouped into 10 clusters of goals and 11 clusters of features. The most important clusters were: 1) trust in the healthcare team, 2) having good information about options, and 3) long-term outlook. Other clusters addressed the need for and urgency of treatment, being independent and active, overall health, quality of life, family and friends, recovery, homecare, and the process of decision-making.ConclusionsThese patient-reported items addressed the impact of the treatment decision on the lives of patients and their families from the time of decision-making through recovery, homecare, and beyond. Many attributes had not been previously reported for sAS. The goals and features that patients' value, and the relative importance that they attach to them, differ from those reported in clinical trials and vary substantially from one individual to another. These findings are being used to design a shared decision-making tool to help patients and their clinicians choose a treatment that aligns with the patients' priorities.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [31] Ontario Health (Quality), 2020, Ont Health Technol Assess Ser, V20, P1
  • [32] Otto CM, 2021, CIRCULATION, V143, P72, DOI [10.1161/cir.0000000000000923, DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923]
  • [33] Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers
    Peters, Ellen
    Dieckmann, Nathan
    Dixon, Anna
    Hibbard, Judith H.
    Mertz, C. K.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2007, 64 (02) : 169 - 190
  • [34] Stress and decision making: effects on valuation, learning, and risk-taking
    Porcelli, Anthony J.
    Delgado, Mauricio R.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2017, 14 : 33 - 39
  • [35] Qu HY, 2011, AM J HEALTH BEHAV, V35, P228
  • [36] What Families Need and Physicians Deliver: Contrasting Communication Preferences Between Surrogate Decision-Makers and Physicians During Outcome Prognostication in Critically Ill TBI Patients
    Quinn, Thomas
    Moskowitz, Jesse
    Khan, Muhammad W.
    Shutter, Lori
    Goldberg, Robert
    Col, Nananda
    Mazor, Kathleen M.
    Muehlschlegel, Susanne
    [J]. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2017, 27 (02) : 154 - 162
  • [37] Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients
    Reardon, M. J.
    Van Mieghem, N. M.
    Popma, J. J.
    Kleiman, N. S.
    Sondergaard, L.
    Mumtaz, M.
    Adams, D. H.
    Deeb, G. M.
    Maini, B.
    Gada, H.
    Chetcuti, S.
    Gleason, T.
    Heiser, J.
    Lange, R.
    Merhi, W.
    Oh, J. K.
    Olsen, P. S.
    Piazza, N.
    Williams, M.
    Windecker, S.
    Yakubov, S. J.
    Grube, E.
    Makkar, R.
    Lee, J. S.
    Conte, J.
    Vang, E.
    Nguyen, H.
    Chang, Y.
    Mugglin, A. S.
    Serruys, P. W. J. C.
    Kappetein, A. P.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (14) : 1321 - 1331
  • [38] REDELMEIER DA, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V273, P302, DOI 10.1001/jama.1995.03520280048038
  • [39] Patients' Willingness to Accept Mitral Valve Procedure-Associated Risks Varies Across Severity of Heart Failure Symptoms
    Reed, Shelby D.
    Fairchild, Angelyn O.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Gonzalez, Juan Marcos
    Mentz, Robert J.
    Krucoff, Mitchell W.
    Vemulapalli, Sreekanth
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (12)
  • [40] Goal-Oriented Patient Care - An Alternative Health Outcomes Paradigm
    Reuben, David B.
    Tinetti, Mary E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (09) : 777 - 779