What matters most to patients with severe aortic stenosis when choosing treatment? Framing the conversation for shared decision making

被引:8
作者
Col, Nananda F. [1 ,2 ]
Otero, Diana M. [3 ]
Lindman, Brian R. [4 ]
Horne, Aaron [5 ]
Levack, Melissa M. [6 ]
Ngo, Long [7 ]
Goodloe, Kimberly
Strong, Susan [8 ]
Kaplan, Elvin
Beaudry, Melissa [9 ]
Coylewright, Megan [10 ]
机构
[1] Shared Decis Making Resources, Georgetown, ME 04548 USA
[2] Univ New England, Biddeford, ME 04005 USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Sch Med, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Struct Heart & Valve Ctr, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Med City North Hills, North Richland Hills, TX USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Cardiac Surg, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[8] Heart Valve Voice US, Washington, DC USA
[9] Cent Vermont Med Ctr, Berlin, VT USA
[10] Erlanger Heart & Lung Inst, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Chattanooga, TN USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 08期
关键词
RACIAL DISPARITIES; VALVE-REPLACEMENT; CARE; PREFERENCES; IMPLANTATION; EXPERIENCES; OUTCOMES; CHOICE; TAVR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0270209
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundGuidelines recommend including the patient's values and preferences when choosing treatment for severe aortic stenosis (sAS). However, little is known about what matters most to patients as they develop treatment preferences. Our objective was to identify, prioritize, and organize patient-reported goals and features of treatment for sAS.MethodsThis multi-center mixed-methods study conducted structured focus groups using the nominal group technique to identify patients' most important treatment goals and features. Patients separately rated and grouped those items using card sorting techniques. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses generated a cognitive map and clusters.Results51 adults with sAS and 3 caregivers with experience choosing treatment (age 36-92 years) were included. Participants were referred from multiple health centers across the U.S. and online. Eight nominal group meetings generated 32 unique treatment goals and 46 treatment features, which were grouped into 10 clusters of goals and 11 clusters of features. The most important clusters were: 1) trust in the healthcare team, 2) having good information about options, and 3) long-term outlook. Other clusters addressed the need for and urgency of treatment, being independent and active, overall health, quality of life, family and friends, recovery, homecare, and the process of decision-making.ConclusionsThese patient-reported items addressed the impact of the treatment decision on the lives of patients and their families from the time of decision-making through recovery, homecare, and beyond. Many attributes had not been previously reported for sAS. The goals and features that patients' value, and the relative importance that they attach to them, differ from those reported in clinical trials and vary substantially from one individual to another. These findings are being used to design a shared decision-making tool to help patients and their clinicians choose a treatment that aligns with the patients' priorities.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Racial Disparities in the Utilization and Outcomes of TAVR TVT Registry Report
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Carroll, John D.
    Li, Zhuokai
    Inohara, Taku
    Kosinski, Andrzej S.
    Szerlip, Molly
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Mack, Michael J.
    Vemulapalli, Sreekanth
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (10) : 936 - 948
  • [2] Passive decision-making preference is associated with anxiety and depression in relatives of patients in the intensive care unit
    Anderson, Wendy G.
    Arnold, Robert M.
    Angus, Derek C.
    Bryce, Cindy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 24 (02) : 249 - 254
  • [3] Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review
    Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna
    Gartner, Fania R.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [4] Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations
    Coast, Joanna
    Al-Janabi, Hareth
    Sutton, Eileen J.
    Horrocks, Susan A.
    Vosper, A. Jane
    Swancutt, Dawn R.
    Flynn, Terry N.
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (06) : 730 - 741
  • [5] Improving patient-provider communication about chronic pain: development and feasibility testing of a shared decision-making tool
    Col, Nananda
    Hull, Stephen
    Springmann, Vicky
    Ngo, Long
    Merritt, Ernie
    Gold, Susan
    Sprintz, Michael
    Genova, Noel
    Nesin, Noah
    Tierman, Brenda
    Sanfilippo, Frank
    Entel, Richard
    Pbert, Lori
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [6] Whose Preferences Matter? A Patient-Centered Approach for Eliciting Treatment Goals
    Col, Nananda F.
    Solomon, Andrew J.
    Springmann, Vicky
    Garbin, Calvin P.
    Ionete, Carolina
    Pbert, Lori
    Alvarez, Enrique
    Tierman, Brenda
    Hopson, Ashli
    Kutz, Christen
    Morales, Idanis Berrios
    Griffin, Carolyn
    Phillips, Glenn
    Ngo, Long H.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2018, 38 (01) : 44 - 55
  • [7] Accuracy of primary care and hospital-based physicians' predictions of elderly outpatients' treatment preferences with and without advance directives
    Coppola, KM
    Ditto, PH
    Danks, JH
    Smucker, WD
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (03) : 431 - 440
  • [8] The Learning Curve for Shared Decision-making in Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
    Coylewright, Megan
    O'Neill, Elizabeth
    Sherman, Ariel
    Gerling, Megan
    Adam, Kaavya
    Xu, Keren
    Grande, Stuart W.
    Dauerman, Harold L.
    Dodge, Shayne E.
    Sobti, Navjot Kaur
    Saunders, Catherine H.
    Schott, Stacey L.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    [J]. JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 5 (04) : 442 - 448
  • [9] Patient-defined goals for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a qualitative analysis
    Coylewright, Megan
    Palmer, Roseanne
    O'Neill, Elizabeth S.
    Robb, John F.
    Fried, Terri R.
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2016, 19 (05) : 1036 - 1043
  • [10] What Should We Include in a Cultural Competence Curriculum? An Emerging Formative Evaluation Process to Foster Curriculum Development
    Crenshaw, Katie
    Shewchuk, Richard M.
    Qu, Haiyan
    Staton, Lisa J.
    Bigby, Judy Ann
    Houston, Thomas K.
    Allison, Jeroan
    Estrada, Carlos A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2011, 86 (03) : 333 - 341