Automatic Virtual Test Technology for Intelligent Driving Systems Considering Both Coverage and Efficiency

被引:47
作者
Gao, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Jianli [3 ]
Han, Zaidao [1 ]
He, Yingdong [4 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Automot Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sichuan Res Inst, Chengdu 610200, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Vehicle & Mobil, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Michigan, Mech Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Testing; Mathematical model; Complexity theory; Analytical models; Solid modeling; Matlab; Three-dimensional displays; Autonomous vehicles; intelligent driving systems; model-in-the-loop testing; automatic test and evaluation; combinational testing;
D O I
10.1109/TVT.2020.3033565
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The testing of the intelligent driving systems is faced with the challenges of efficiency because real traffic scenarios are infinite, uncontrollable and difficult to be precisely defined. Based on the complexity index of scenario that designed to measure the test effect indirectly, a new combinational testing algorithm of test cases generation is proposed to make a balance among multiple objects including test coverage, the number of test cases and test effect. Then a joint simulation platform based on Matlab, PreScan and Carsim is built up to realize the construction of 3D test environment, execution of test scenarios and evaluation of test results automatically and seamlessly. The strategy proposed in this paper is validated by applying it to a traffic jam pilot system. The result shows that the proposed strategy can improve the overall complexity of the designed test scenarios effectively, which can help us detect system faults faster and easier. And the time required to conduct tests is reduced obviously by means of automation.
引用
收藏
页码:14365 / 14376
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 22178 ISO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 17361 ISO
[3]   Model-Based Threat Assessment for Avoiding Arbitrary Vehicle Collisions [J].
Brannstrom, Mattias ;
Coelingh, Erik ;
Sjoberg, Jonas .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2010, 11 (03) :658-669
[4]   Bayesian optimization for learning gaits under uncertainty [J].
Calandra, Roberto ;
Seyfarth, Andre ;
Peters, Jan ;
Deisenroth, Marc Peter .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 76 (1-2) :5-23
[5]   Full Physics Simulation Study of Guardrail Radar-Returns for 77 GHz Automotive Radar Systems [J].
Chipengo, Ushemadzoro .
IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 :70053-70060
[6]   The AETG system: An approach to testing based on combinatorial design [J].
Cohen, DM ;
Dalal, SR ;
Fredman, ML ;
Patton, GC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1997, 23 (07) :437-444
[7]  
Czerwonka J., 2006, P 24 PAC NW SOFTW QU, P419
[8]   Test Scenario Generation and Optimization Technology for Intelligent Driving Systems [J].
Duan, Jianli ;
Gao, Feng ;
He, Yingdong .
IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2022, 14 (01) :115-127
[9]   MIT Advanced Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Naturalistic Driving Study of Driver Behavior and Interaction With Automation [J].
Fridman, Lex ;
Brown, Daniel E. ;
Glazer, Michael ;
Angell, William ;
Dodd, Spencer ;
Jenik, Benedikt ;
Terwilliger, Jack ;
Patsekin, Aleksandr ;
Kindelsberger, Julia ;
Ding, Li ;
Seaman, Sean ;
Mehler, Alea ;
Sipperley, Andrew ;
Pettinato, Anthony ;
Seppelt, Bobbie D. ;
Angell, Linda ;
Mehler, Bruce ;
Reimer, Bryan .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :102021-102038
[10]   Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset [J].
Geiger, A. ;
Lenz, P. ;
Stiller, C. ;
Urtasun, R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 2013, 32 (11) :1231-1237