Multiple gene expression classifiers from different array platforms predict poor prognosis of colorectal cancer

被引:107
作者
Lin, Yu-Hsin
Friederichs, Jan
Black, Michael A.
Mages, Joerg
Rosenberg, Robert
Guilford, Parry J.
Phillips, Vicky
Thompson-Fawcett, Mark
Kasabov, Nikola
Toro, Tumi
Merrie, Arend E.
van Rij, Andre
Yoon, Han-Seung
McCall, John L.
Siewert, Joerg Ruediger
Holzmann, Bernhard
Reeve, Anthony E.
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Canc Genet Lab, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Biochem, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Univ Otago, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Dunedin, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Pathol, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Pacific Edge Biotechnol Ltd, Ctr Innovat, Dunedin, New Zealand
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Surg, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[7] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Inst Med Mikrobiol Immunol & Hyg, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[8] Auckland Univ Technol, Knowledge Engn & Discovery Res Inst, Auckland, New Zealand
[9] Univ Auckland, Dept Surg, Auckland 1, New Zealand
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2734
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to develop gene classifiers to predict colorectal cancer recurrence. We investigated whether gene classifiers derived from two tumor series using different array platforms could be independently validated by application to the alternate series of patients. Experimental Design: Colorectal tumors from New Zealand (n = 149) and Germany (n = 55) patients had a minimum follow-up of 5 years. RNA was profiled using oligonucleotide printed microarrays (New Zealand samples) and Affymetrix arrays (German samples). Classifiers based on clinical data, gene expression data, and a combination of the two were produced and used to predict recurrence. The use of gene expression information was found to improve the predictive ability in both data sets. The New Zealand and German gene classifiers were cross-validated on the German and New Zealand data sets, respectively, to validate their predictive power. Survival analyses were done to evaluate the ability of the classifiers to predict patient survival. Results: The prediction rates for the New Zealand and German gene-based classifiers were 77% and 84%, respectively. Despite significant differences in study design and technologies used, both classifiers retained prognostic power when applied to the alternate series of patients. Survival analyses showed that both classifiers gave a better stratification of patients than the traditional clinical staging. One classifier contained genes associated with cancer progression, whereas the other had a large immune response gene cluster concordant with the role of a host immune response in modulating colorectal cancer outcome. Conclusions: The successful reciprocal validation of gene-based classifiers on different patient cohorts and technology platforms supports the power of microarray technology for individualized outcome prediction of colorectal cancer patients. Furthermore, many of the genes identified have known biological functions congruent with the predicted outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 507
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Cloning and expression of a novel MAPKK-like protein kinase, lymphokine-activated killer T-cell-originated protein kinase, specifically expressed in the testis and activated lymphoid cells [J].
Abe, Y ;
Matsumoto, S ;
Kito, K ;
Ueda, N .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 275 (28) :21525-21531
[2]   Systematic review of genetic influences on the prognosis of colorectal cancer [J].
Anwar, S ;
Frayling, M ;
Scott, NA ;
Carlson, GL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (10) :1275-1291
[3]   Molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer - Implications for molecular diagnosis [J].
Arnold, CN ;
Goel, A ;
Blum, HE ;
Boland, CR .
CANCER, 2005, 104 (10) :2035-2047
[4]  
Barnes CJ, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P1251
[5]   Colon cancer prognosis prediction by gene expression profiling [J].
Barrier, A ;
Lemoine, A ;
Boelle, PY ;
Tse, C ;
Brault, D ;
Chiappini, F ;
Breittschneider, J ;
Lacaine, F ;
Houry, S ;
Huguier, M ;
Van der Laan, MJ ;
Speed, T ;
Debuire, B ;
Flahault, A ;
Dudoit, S .
ONCOGENE, 2005, 24 (40) :6155-6164
[6]  
Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P4352
[7]   Application of DNA microarray technology in determining breast cancer prognosis and therapeutic response [J].
Brennan, DJ ;
O'Brien, SL ;
Fagan, A ;
Culhane, AC ;
Higgins, DG ;
Duffy, MJ ;
Gallagher, WM .
EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2005, 5 (08) :1069-1083
[8]   The relationship between tumour T-lymphocyte infiltration, the systemic inflammatory response and survival in patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer [J].
Canna, K ;
McArdle, PA ;
McMillan, DC ;
McNicol, AM ;
Smith, GW ;
McKee, RF ;
McArdle, CS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (04) :651-654
[9]  
Dong VM, 2003, EUR J DERMATOL, V13, P224
[10]   Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set? [J].
Ein-Dor, L ;
Kela, I ;
Getz, G ;
Givol, D ;
Domany, E .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (02) :171-178