Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users

被引:38
作者
Moberly, Aaron C. [1 ]
Reed, Jessa [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2019年 / 62卷 / 08期
关键词
SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION; RAVENS PROGRESSIVE MATRICES; WORKING-MEMORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; OLDER-ADULTS; PREDICTORS; PERCEPTION; AGE; LISTENERS;
D O I
10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0472
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Speech recognition relies upon a listener's successful pairing of the acoustic-phonetic details from the bottom-up input with top-down linguistic processing of the incoming speech stream. When the speech is spectrally degraded, such as through a cochlear implant (CI), this role of top-down processing is poorly understood. This study explored the interactions of top-down processing, specifically the use of semantic context during sentence recognition, and the relative contributions of different neurocognitive functions during speech recognition in adult CI users. Method: Data from 41 experienced adult CI users were collected and used in analyses. Participants were tested for recognition and immediate repetition of speech materials in the clear. They were asked to repeat 2 sets of sentence materials, 1 that was semantically meaningful and 1 that was syntactically appropriate but semantically anomalous. Participants also were tested on 4 visual measures of neurocognitive functioning to assess working memory capacity (Digit Span; Wechsler, 2004), speed of lexical access (Test of Word Reading Efficiency; Torgeson, Wagner, & Rashotte, 1999), inhibitory control (Stroop; Stroop, 1935), and nonverbal fluid reasoning (Raven's Progressive Matrices; Raven, 2000). Results: Individual listeners' inhibitory control predicted recognition of meaningful sentences when controlling for performance on anomalous sentences, our proxy for the quality of the bottom-up input. Additionally, speed of lexical access and nonverbal reasoning predicted recognition of anomalous sentences. Conclusions: Findings from this study identified inhibitory control as a potential mechanism at work when listeners make use of semantic context during sentence recognition. Moreover, speed of lexical access and nonverbal reasoning were associated with recognition of sentences that lacked semantic context. These results motivate the development of improved comprehensive rehabilitative approaches for adult patients with CIs to optimize use of top-down processing and underlying core neurocognitive functions.
引用
收藏
页码:2895 / 2905
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults [J].
Akeroyd, Michael A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 :S53-S71
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, RES SPOKEN LANGUAGE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Wechsler intelligence scale for children-fourth edition-WISC-IV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1981, WAIS R MANUAL
[5]   Working Memory, Age, and Hearing Loss: Susceptibility to Hearing Aid Distortion [J].
Arehart, Kathryn H. ;
Souza, Pamela ;
Baca, Rosalinda ;
Kates, James M. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (03) :251-260
[6]   Short-Term and Working Memory Impairments in Early-Implanted, Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users Are Independent of Audibility and Speech Production [J].
AuBuchon, Angela M. ;
Pisoni, David B. ;
Kronenberger, William G. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (06) :733-737
[7]   Working memory [J].
Baddeley, Alan .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) :R136-R140
[8]   STANDARDIZATION OF A TEST OF SPEECH-PERCEPTION IN NOISE [J].
BILGER, RC ;
NUETZEL, JM ;
RABINOWITZ, WM ;
RZECZKOWSKI, C .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1984, 27 (01) :32-48
[9]  
Boothroyd A., 1985, CUNY LASER VIDEO DIS
[10]   Processing Mechanisms in Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Evidence from Reaction Times and Sentence Interpretation [J].
Carroll, Rebecca ;
Uslar, Verena ;
Brand, Thomas ;
Ruigendijk, Esther .
EAR AND HEARING, 2016, 37 (06) :E391-E401