An Interval-Based Approach for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization of Project Portfolios

被引:25
作者
Balderas, Fausto [1 ]
Fernandez, Eduardo [2 ]
Gomez-Santillan, Claudia [1 ]
Rungel-Valdez, Nelson [3 ]
Cruz, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Mexican Inst Technol, Madero Inst Technol, Postgrad & Res Div, Tamaulipas 89440, Mexico
[2] Autonomous Univ Sinaloa, Fac Civil Engn, Sinaloa 80040, Mexico
[3] Natl Mexican Inst Technol, Madero Inst Technol, CONACYT Res Fellow, Tamaulipas 89440, Mexico
关键词
Project portfolio selection; multi-objective optimization; evolutionary computation; outranking methods; imperfect knowledge; ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION; METAHEURISTIC APPROACH; OUTRANKING APPROACH; SELECTION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1142/S021962201950024X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Project portfolio selection is addressed here as a multi-objective optimization problem. This work introduces an interval-based method that takes into consideration imperfect knowledge of the contribution of projects to a portfolio, the project requirements, available resources and preference parameters in the model. The multi-objective optimization problem is solved using an evolutionary algorithm that is adapted to handle intervals. To direct the search toward the region of interest of the Pareto frontier, the preferences of the decision maker (DM) are incorporated using an interval-based outranking approach. This allows to address problems with many objective functions; intransitive preferences and incomparability situations can also be handled using this approach. In terms of analyzing robustness, the DM can obtain different solutions according to his/her level of conservatism. The effectiveness of this proposal was tested both on an example from the related literature and another example of a public project portfolio with nine objective functions and large number of applicant projects.
引用
收藏
页码:1317 / 1358
页数:42
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Adra SF, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4403, P908
[2]  
Aissi H, 2010, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V142, P87, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_4
[3]   Integration of ELECTRE III and PROMETHEE II Decision-Making Methods with an Interval Approach: Application in Selection of Appropriate Structural Systems [J].
Balali, Vahid ;
Zahraie, Banafsheh ;
Roozbahani, Abbas .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 28 (02) :297-314
[4]  
Balderas F, 2016, INT J COMB OPTIM PRO, V7, P101
[5]  
Bechikh S., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 11th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS 2011), P377, DOI 10.1109/HIS.2011.6122135
[6]  
Branke J, 2005, STUD FUZZ SOFT COMP, V167, P461
[7]  
Branke J., 2016, Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, P977
[8]   Using Choquet integral as preference model in interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization [J].
Branke, Juergen ;
Corrente, Salvatore ;
Greco, Salvatore ;
Slowinski, Roman ;
Zielniewicz, Piotr .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 250 (03) :884-901
[9]   Solving a comprehensive model for multiobjective project portfolio selection [J].
Carazo, A. F. ;
Gomez, Trinidad ;
Molina, Julian ;
Hernandez-Diaz, Alfredo G. ;
Guerrero, Flor M. ;
Caballero, Rafael .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 37 (04) :630-639
[10]  
Carazo A. F., 2011, RECTA, V12, P123