PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION OF GROUNDNUT SHELLING USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY

被引:1
|
作者
Muhammad, Aliyu Idris [1 ,2 ]
Isiaka, Moshud [3 ]
Attanda, Muhammed Lawal [2 ]
Shittu, Sarafadeen Kolawole [2 ]
Lawan, Ibrahim [2 ]
Bomoi, Muhammad Isa [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Bayero Univ Kano, Kano, Nigeria
[3] Ahmadu Bello Univ, Zaria, Nigeria
[4] Fed Minist Sci & Technol, Abuja, Nigeria
关键词
Box-Behnken design; optimum responses; performance evaluation; groundnut processing; PARAMETERS; PEANUT;
D O I
10.2478/ata-2021-0001
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the influence of drum speed, moisture content, and feed rate on the performance indices of groundnut sheller using Ex-Dakar groundnut variety. Response surface methodology was used to study the influence of input variables and optimize the processing conditions. The developed second-order polynomial model adequately described the performance responses, including output capacity, shelling and cleaning efficiencies, and kernel damage. The input variables indicated significant influences on performance responses. The optimized processing variables for the responses were drum speed of 210 rpm, moisture content of 8%, and feed rate of 350 kg.h(-1). The optimum responses obtained were output capacity of 302.52 kg.h(-1), shelling efficiency of 97.61%, cleaning efficiency of 53.16%, and kernel damage of 4.04%. These performance responses were validated experimentally and were close to the observed results.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling and Optimization of a Solar Powered Groundnut Sheller Performance Using Response Surface Methodology
    Choudhary, Vinod
    Machavaram, Rajendra
    Soni, Peeyush
    AMA-AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION IN ASIA AFRICA AND LATIN AMERICA, 2024, 55 (01):
  • [2] Performance modeling of a groundnut stripper using response surface methodology
    Tewari, V.K.
    Chandel, Narendra Singh
    Vidhu, K.P.
    International Agricultural Engineering Journal, 2013, 22 (01): : 39 - 48
  • [3] Optimization on wear performance of UHMWPE composites using response surface methodology
    Chang, Boon Peng
    Akil, Hazizan Md
    Nasir, Ramdziah Bt
    Khan, Abbas
    TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 88 : 252 - 262
  • [4] Experimental Optimization of the Propeller Turbine Performance Using the Response Surface Methodology
    Velasquez, Laura
    Rubio-Clemente, Ainhoa
    Tobon, Daniel
    Botero, Francisco
    Arrieta, Carlos
    Chica, Edwin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (19)
  • [5] PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION OF TRAPEZIUM RIB PARAMETERS USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY
    Sharma, Naveen
    Sharma, Vaibhav
    Tariq, Andallib
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME GAS TURBINE INDIA CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 1, 2018,
  • [6] Physical properties optimization of POME-groundnut-naphthenic based graphene nanolubricant using response surface methodology
    Osama, Mohamed
    Walvekar, Rashmi
    Khalid, Mohammad
    Rasheed, Abdul Khaliq
    Wong, Wai Yin
    Gupta, Thummalapalli Chandra Sekhara Manikyam
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 193 : 277 - 289
  • [7] Thermal performance optimization of heat pipe using nanofluid: response surface methodology
    Naveen Kumar Gupta
    Abhishek Sharma
    Pushpendra Kumar Singh Rathore
    Sujit Kumar Verma
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2020, 42
  • [8] Experimental assessment and optimization of the performance of a biodiesel engine using response surface methodology
    Mishra, Prasheet
    Mohapatra, Taraprasad
    Sahoo, Sudhansu S.
    Padhi, Biranchi N.
    Giri, Nimay Chandra
    Emara, Ahmed
    AboRas, Kareem M.
    ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [9] The impact of tractor drawbar height on performance and optimization using response surface methodology
    Seflek, Ali Yavuz
    Orhan, Nuri
    Ozkan, Mete
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [10] OPTIMIZATION OF PERFORMANCE OF BAMBOO MAT CORRUGATED SHEETS USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY
    Gao, Li
    Luo, Shupin
    Guo, Wenjing
    WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, 2019, 51 (03): : 276 - 287