Key Collaborative Factors When Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations Work With Primary Care Clinics to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening: Relationships, Data, and Quality Improvement Infrastructure

被引:11
作者
Davis, Melinda M. [1 ,2 ]
Gunn, Rose [2 ]
Pham, Robyn [2 ]
Wiser, Amy [1 ]
Lich, Kristen Hassmiller [3 ]
Wheeler, Stephanie B. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Coronado, Gloria D. [6 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Family Med, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,Mail Code L222, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Rural Practice Based Res Network, Portland, OR USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Ctr Hlth Promot & Dis Prevent, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente, Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; SCIENCE; US;
D O I
10.5888/pcd16.180395
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are implementing interventions to achieve triple-aim objectives of improved quality and experience of care while maintaining costs. Partnering across organizational boundaries is perceived as critical to ACO success. Methods We conducted a comparative case study of 14 Medicaid ACOs in Oregon and their contracted primary care clinics using public performance data, key informant interviews, and consultation field notes. We focused on how ACOs work with clinics to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening - one incentivized performance metric. Results ACOs implemented a broad spectrum of multi-component interventions designed to increase CRC screening. The most common interventions focused on reducing structural barriers (n = 12 ACOs), delivering provider assessment and feedback (n = 11), and providing patient reminders (n = 7). ACOs developed their processes and infrastructure for working with clinics over time. Facilitators of successful collaboration included a history of and commitment to collaboration (partnership); the ability to provide accurate data to prioritize action and monitor improvement (performance data), and supporting clinics' reflective learning through facilitation, learning collaboratives; and support of ACO as well as clinic-based staffing (quality improvement infrastructure). Two unintended consequences of ACO-clinic partnership emerged: potential exclusion of smaller clinics and metric focus and fatigue. Conclusion Our findings identified partnership, performance data, and quality improvement infrastructure as critical dimensions when Medicaid ACOs work with primary care to improve CRC screening. Findings may extend to other metric targets.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, HLTH REFORM POLICY P
[2]  
[Anonymous], MAPP MED DEL SYST PA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, DOING QUALITATIVE RE
[4]  
[Anonymous], ACC CAR ORG ACOS
[5]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD BUSINESS REV
[6]  
[Anonymous], MED ACC ORG STAT UPD
[7]  
[Anonymous], COL CANC CONTR PROGR
[8]   Use of Quality Improvement Strategies Among Small to Medium-Size US Primary Care Practices [J].
Balasubramanian, Bijal A. ;
Marino, Miguel ;
Cohen, Deborah J. ;
Ward, Rikki L. ;
Preston, Alex ;
Springer, Rachel J. ;
Lindner, Stephan R. ;
Edwards, Samuel ;
McConnell, K. John ;
Crabtree, Benjamin F. ;
Miller, William L. ;
Stange, Kurt C. ;
Solberg, Leif I. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2018, 16 :S35-S43
[9]   Accountable care organizations in the USA: Types, developments and challenges [J].
Barnes, Andrew J. ;
Unruh, Lynn ;
Chukmaitov, Askar ;
van Ginneken, Ewout .
HEALTH POLICY, 2014, 118 (01) :1-7
[10]   Technical Assistance for Primary Care Practice Transformation: Free Help to Perform Unpaid Labor? [J].
Casalino, Lawrence P. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2018, 16 :S12-S15