Diagnostic Accuracy and Acceptability of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) Among US Veterans

被引:93
作者
Bovin, Michelle J. [1 ,2 ]
Kimerling, Rachel [3 ,4 ]
Weathers, Frank W. [5 ]
Prins, Annabel [3 ,6 ]
Marx, Brian P. [1 ,2 ]
Post, Edward P. [7 ,8 ]
Schnurr, Paula P. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Natl Ctr PTSD, 116B-4,150 S Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02130 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] VA Palo Alto Healthcare Syst, Natl Ctr PTSD, Palo Alto, CA USA
[4] VA Palo Alto Healthcare Syst, Ctr Innovat Implementat, Palo Alto, CA USA
[5] Auburn Univ, Dept Psychol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[6] San Jose State Univ, Dept Psychol, San Jose, CA 95192 USA
[7] Ann Arbor Vet Affairs Healthcare Syst, Vet Affairs Cent Off, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[9] Natl Ctr PTSD, White River Jct, VT USA
[10] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Hanover, NH USA
关键词
NATIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEY; HEALTH-CARE; ALCOHOL; SYMPTOMS; DEPLOYMENT; SEVERITY; VALIDITY; TESTS; PTSD;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36733
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a serious mental health disorder that can be effectively treated with empirically based practices. PTSD screening is essential for identifying undetected cases and providing patients with appropriate care. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the Primary Care PTSD screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (PC-PTSD-5) is a diagnostically accurate and acceptable measure for use in Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study enrolled participants from May 19, 2017, to September 26, 2018. Participants were recruited from primary care clinics across 2 VA Medical Centers. Session 1 was conducted in person, and session 2 was completed within 30 days via telephone. A consecutive sample of 1594 veterans, aged 18 years or older, who were scheduled for a primary care visit was recruited. Data analysis was performed from March 2019 to August 2020. EXPOSURES In session 1, participants completed a battery of questionnaires. In session 2, a research assistant administered the PC-PTSD-5 to participants, and then a clinician assessor blind to PC-PTSD-5 results conducted a structured diagnostic interview for PTSD. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The range of PC-PTSD-5 cut points overall and across gender was assessed, and diagnostic performance was evaluated by calculating weighted. values. RESULTS In total, 495 of 1594 veterans (31%) participated, and 396 completed all measures and were included in the analyses. Participants were demographically similar to the VA primary care population (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [15.5] years; age range, 21-93 years) and were predominantly male (333 participants [84.1%]) and White (296 of 394 participants [ 75.1%]). The PC-PTSD-5 had high levels of diagnostic accuracy for the overall sample (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.927; 95% CI, 0.896-0.959), men (AUC, 0.932; 95% CI, 0.894-0.969), and women (AUC, 0.899, 95% CI, 0.824-0.974). A cut point of 4 ideally balanced false negatives and false positives for the overall sample and for men. However, for women, this cut point resulted in high numbers of false negatives (6 veterans [33.3%]). A cut point of 3 fit better for women, despite increasing the number of false positives. Participants rated the PC-PTSD-5 as highly acceptable. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The PC-PTSD-5 is an accurate and acceptable screening tool for use in VA primary care settings. Because performance parameters will change according to sample, clinicians should consider sample characteristics and screening purposes when selecting a cut point.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, VET HLTH ADM TREATM
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU
  • [3] Aziz Mohamed A, 2004, J Psychiatr Pract, V10, P307, DOI 10.1097/00131746-200409000-00004
  • [4] Validating the primary care posttraumatic stress disorder screen and the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist with soldiers returning from combat
    Bliese, Paul D.
    Wright, Kathleen M.
    Adler, Amy B.
    Cabrera, Oscar
    Castro, Carl A.
    Hoge, Charles W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 76 (02) : 272 - 281
  • [5] Same-Day Integrated Mental Health Care and PTSD Diagnosis and Treatment Among VHA Primary Care Patients With Positive PTSD Screens
    Bohnert, Kipling M.
    Sripada, Rebecca K.
    Mach, Jennifer
    McCarthy, John F.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2016, 67 (01) : 94 - 100
  • [6] Bossuyt PM, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V351, DOI [10.1136/bmj.h5527, 10.1148/radiol.2015151516, 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280]
  • [7] Two brief alcohol-screening tests from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) - Validation in a female veterans affairs patient population
    Bradley, KA
    Bush, KR
    Epler, AJ
    Dobie, DJ
    Davis, TM
    Sporleder, JL
    Maynard, C
    Burman, ML
    Kivlahan, DR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (07) : 821 - 829
  • [8] Using alcohol screening results and treatment history to assess the severity of at-risk drinking in Veterans Affairs primary care patients
    Bradley, KA
    Kivlahan, DR
    Zhou, XH
    Sporleder, JL
    Epler, AJ
    McCormick, KA
    Merrill, JO
    McDonell, MB
    Fihn, SD
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 28 (03) : 448 - 455
  • [9] Epidemiologic studies of trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder, and other psychiatric disorders
    Breslau, N
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2002, 47 (10): : 923 - 929
  • [10] Use of General Primary Care, Specialized Primary Care, and Other Veterans Affairs Services Among High-Risk Veterans
    Chang, Evelyn T.
    Zulman, Donna M.
    Nelson, Karin M.
    Rosland, Ann-Marie
    Ganz, David A.
    Fihn, Stephan D.
    Piegari, Rebecca
    Rubenstein, Lisa, V
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (06) : E208120