Assessing the economic and mitigation benefits of climate-smart agriculture and its implications for political economy: A case study in Southern Africa

被引:51
作者
Branca, Giacomo [1 ]
Arslan, Aslihan [2 ]
Paolantonio, Adriana [2 ]
Grewer, Uwe [3 ,4 ]
Cattaneo, Andrea [5 ]
Cavatassi, Romina [2 ]
Lipper, Leslie [6 ]
Hillier, Jonathan [7 ]
Vetter, Sylvia [7 ]
机构
[1] Tuscia Univ, Viterbo, Italy
[2] Int Fund Agr Dev IFAD, Rome, Italy
[3] Queensland Alliance Agr & Food Innovat QAAFI, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[4] CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[5] Food & Agr Org FAO, Rome, Italy
[6] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[7] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
Sustainable agriculture; Ecological-economic model; Smallholder farming; Marginal abatement cost; Cost-effective mitigation; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; INNOVATIONS; CHALLENGES; ADOPTION; DELIVER; POLICY; SOIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125161
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change poses a serious risk to the economic growth of sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainable enhancement of resilience and mitigation capacity of small farm households is a major political economy goal. This paper has the objective to assess the on-farm economic and mitigation benefits of climate-smart agriculture production and their cost-effectiveness to be used as a prioritization criterion for policy incentives. An interdisciplinary model which integrates elements of economics and ecological science at farm-scale is developed and applied using a unique dataset for Malawi and Zambia built through household surveys. Results show that switching from conventional to climate-smart farming enhances economic returns more significantly in semi-dry areas than in sub-humid ones. However, high up-front costs hinder technology adoption. Negative abatement costs for most smart farming options indicate synergies between livelihood enhancement and mitigation. Land management based on minimum tillage, crop residues incorporation, use of cover crops, and inclusion of legumes has relatively higher economic returns. Agroforestry provides lower economic returns but the highest emission abatement potential. Payments for mitigation benefits could be a management strategy to incentivize cleaner agriculture production if tailored appropriately. These results strengthen the case for public support to climate-smart agriculture scaling-up within policy and planning strategies. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Sustainable agriculture options for production, greenhouse gasses and pollution alleviation, and nutrient recycling in emerging and transitional nations - An overview [J].
Adegbeye, M. J. ;
Reddy, P. Ravi Kanth ;
Obaisi, A. I. ;
Elghandour, M. M. M. Y. ;
Oyebamiji, K. J. ;
Salem, A. Z. M. ;
Morakinyo-Fasipe, O. T. ;
Cipriano-Salazar, M. ;
Camacho-Diaz, L. M. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 242
[2]  
Akinnifesi F. K., 2008, Agricultural Journal, V3, P58
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Agric Impacts Clim Chang, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429326349-4
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Tech. Rep.
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, IPCC Working Group II Contribution to AR5
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Global landscape of climate finance 2019
[7]  
Asfaw S., 2018, CLIMATE SMART AGR BU, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-61194-5_22, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-61194-5_22]
[8]  
Audsley E., 1997, HARMONISATION ENV LI, V139
[9]   Estimation of global NH3 volatilization loss from synthetic fertilizers and animal manure applied to arable lands and grasslands -: art. no. 1024 [J].
Bouwman, AF ;
Boumans, LJM ;
Batjes, NH .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2002, 16 (02)
[10]  
Branca G., 2012, IDENTIFYING OPPORTUN, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.1.2631.8809, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.2631.8809]