Rethinking the political economy of place: challenges of productivity and inclusion

被引:29
作者
Evenhuis, Emil [1 ]
Lee, Neil [2 ]
Martin, Ron [3 ]
Tyler, Peter [4 ]
机构
[1] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, POB 30314, NL-2500 GH The Hague, Netherlands
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Geog & Environm, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Downing St, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, 19 Silver St, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England
关键词
productivity slowdown; economic inequality; spatial inequality; inclusive growth; uneven development; INEQUALITY; POLICY; PERSPECTIVE; EMPLOYMENT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1093/cjres/rsaa043
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The global financial crisis of just over a decade ago exposed longer-term systemic problems in global capitalism of which two of the most prominent are the slowdown in the underlying trend rate of productivity growth, alongside a rise in economic and spatial inequalities in many advanced economies. The Covid-19 pandemic looks set to further amplify these problems. This Editorial begins by discussing the scale of the productivity slowdown and of the widening inequalities that have emerged, particularly with regard to their spatial dimension: that is how the uneven and slow development of productivity and rise in inequalities have played out across and within regions and cities. It then briefly considers underlying factors that lie behind these trends, including financialisation / financial globalization, the diminishing role of organised labour, segmentation of the labour market favouring workers who play a key role in financialisation, together with the increasing polarisation within societies according to skill and, crucially, the impact of changing industrial composition particularly as it relates to the rise of the high-tech sectors. The Editorial then examines in what ways the slowdown of productivity and widening of economic and spatial inequalities, may be interrelated, and questions the notion of any efficiency-equity trade-off. Lastly, it considers whether the 'inclusive growth' agenda can potentially reconcile the two ambitions of improving productivity performance and lessening inequalities, reflecting on what inclusive growth could mean, and what it could imply in terms of policy. Thus far, it appears that an inclusive growth agenda has only gained some traction at the subnational level, which seems to reflect - at least in part - attempts by cities and regions to address gaps in policy left by national governments.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 24
页数:22
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D, 2011, HBK ECON, V4, P1043, DOI 10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5
[2]  
Algan Y., 2018, For Good Measure: Advancing Research on Well-being Metrics Beyond GDP, DOI [10.1787/9789264307278-12-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264307278-12-EN]
[3]  
Alvaredo F., 2018, Informe sobre la desigualdad global
[4]  
Andersen T. M., 2016, 11189 CEPR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, IMF Policy Research Working Paper, DOI DOI 10.1596/1813-9450-4851
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 104 INT POL CTR INCL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Rethinking Capitalism: Economics and Policy for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Measuring regional and local wellbeing for policy making
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, LIF MEAS WELL BEING
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1995, EQUITY EFFICIENCY TR