Physics-Based Modeling and MPC for the Air Path of a Two-Stage Turbocharged SI Engine with Low Pressure EGR

被引:3
作者
Keller, Martin [1 ]
Geiger, Severin [2 ]
Abel, Dirk [1 ]
Albin, Thivaharan [3 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Automat Control, Campus Blvd 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Combust Engines, Forckenbeckstr 4, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[3] Embotech AG, Technopk Str 1, CH-8005 Zurich, Switzerland
来源
2020 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC 2020) | 2020年
关键词
D O I
10.23919/ecc51009.2020.9143971
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
For increasing the efficiency and simultaneously decreasing pollutant emissions of internal combustion engines, innovative air path concepts such as turbocharged gasoline engines with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) are in the focus of current research. These air and EGR path concepts impose high demands on the process control due to the nonlinearities and cross-couplings. This contribution presents a physics-based modeling approach and a nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC) for the air path control of a sequentially two-stage turbocharged gasoline engine with low pressure EGR. By using EGR at high loads, the in-cylinder temperature can be lowered, reducing the knock probability, while at the same time preventing the need for enrichment of the air/fuel ratio. As air and EGR path are cross-coupled and show different delay times, a model predictive control (MPC) concept is proposed. Therefore, the air and EGR path are modeled in a physical manner, where possible. The model set up is based on a small amount of dyno-run measurement data acquired with a test vehicle. The model is built up such that it can be used within a MPC algorithm. The proposed control concept consists of an extended Kalman Filter for state and disturbance estimation and a NMPC controller considering the dynamic behavior of the air and EGR path. Subsequently, the nonlinear control concept for the two-stage turbocharged spark-ignited (SI) engine with Low Pressure EGR is implemented on a rapid control prototyping hardware, validated via simulative tests and compared to a linear MPC.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 506
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Adomeit P, 2010, MTZ MOTORTECH, V71, P362
[2]  
Albin Thivaharan, 2015, IFAC - Papers Online, V48, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.10.018
[3]   In-Vehicle Realization of Nonlinear MPC for Gasoline Two-Stage Turbocharging Airpath Control [J].
Albin, Thivaharan ;
Ritter, Dennis ;
Liberda, Norman ;
Quirynen, Rien ;
Diehl, Moritz .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 26 (05) :1606-1618
[4]   CasADi: a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control [J].
Andersson, Joel A. E. ;
Gillis, Joris ;
Horn, Greg ;
Rawlings, James B. ;
Diehl, Moritz .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING COMPUTATION, 2019, 11 (01) :1-36
[5]  
Bemporad A., 2018, SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0875, DOI DOI 10.4271/2018-01-0875
[6]  
Bock H. G., 1984, IFAC Proceedings, V17, P1603, DOI 10.1016/S1474-6670
[7]   A real-time iteration scheme for nonlinear optimization in optimal feedback control [J].
Diehl, M ;
Bock, HG ;
Schlöder, JP .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 43 (05) :1714-1736
[8]  
Dingelstadt R., 2014, MTZ MOT Z, V75, P56
[9]   Explicit MIMO Model Predictive Boost Pressure Control of a Two-Stage Turbocharged Diesel Engine [J].
Emekli, Mustafa Engin ;
Guvenc, Bilin Aksun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 25 (02) :521-534
[10]   qpOASES: a parametric active-set algorithm for quadratic programming [J].
Ferreau, Hans Joachim ;
Kirches, Christian ;
Potschka, Andreas ;
Bock, Hans Georg ;
Diehl, Moritz .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING COMPUTATION, 2014, 6 (04) :327-363