Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis?

被引:222
作者
Ditillo, Michael F.
Dziura, James D.
Rabinovici, Reuven
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Trauma Surg Crit Care & Surg Emergencies, Dept Surg, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000231726.53487.dd
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To examine whether delayed surgical intervention in adult patients with acute appendicitis is safe by correlating the interval from onset of symptoms to operation (total interval) with the degree of pathology and incidence of postoperative complications. Summary Background Data: Prompt appendectomy has long been the standard of care for acute appendicitis because of the risk of progression to advanced pathology. This time-honored practice has been recently challenged by studies in pediatric patients, which suggested that acute appendicitis can be managed in an elective manner once antibiotic therapy is initiated. No such data are available in adult patients with acute appendicitis. Methods: A retrospective review of 1081 patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 1998 and 2004 was conducted. The following parameters were monitored and correlated: demographics, time from onset of symptoms to arrival at the emergency room (patient interval) and from arrival to the emergency room to the operating room (hospital interval), physical, computed tomography (CT scan) and pathologic findings, complications, length of stay, and length of antibiotic treatment. Pathologic state was graded 1 (G1) for acute appendicitis, 2 (G2) for gangrenous acute appendicitis, 3 (G3) for perforation or phlegmon, and 4 (G4) for a periappendicular abscess. Results: The risk of advanced pathology, defined as a higher pathology grade, increased with the total interval. When this interval was <12 hours, the risk of developing G1, G2, G3, and G4, was 94%, 0%, 3%, and 3%, respectively. These values changed to 60%, 7%, 27%, and 6%, respectively, when the total interval was 48 to 71 hours and to 54%, 7%, 26%, and 13% for longer than 71 hours. The odds for progressive pathology was 13 times higher for the total interval >71 hours group compared with total interval <12 hours (95% confidence interval = 4.7-37.1). Although both prolonged patient and hospital intervals were associated with advanced pathology, prehospital delays were more profoundly related to worsening pathology compared with in-hospital delays (P < 0.001). Advanced pathology was associated with tenderness to palpation beyond the right lower quadrant (P < 0.001), guarding (P < 0.001), rebound (P < 0.001), and CT scan findings of peritoneal fluid (P = 0.01), fecalith (P = 0.01), dilation of the appendix (P < 0.001), and perforation (P < 0.001). Increased length of hospital stay (P < 0.001) and antibiotic treatment (P < 0.001) as well as postoperative complications (P < 0.001) also correlated with progressive pathology. Conclusion: In adult patients with acute appendicitis, the risk of developing advanced pathology and postoperative complications increases with time; therefore, delayed appendectomy is unsafe. As delays in seeking medical help are difficult to control, prompt appendectomy is mandatory. Because these conclusions are derived from retrospective data, a prospective study is required to confirm their validity.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 660
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Acute appendicitis: the continuing role for active observation [J].
Bachoo, P ;
Mahomed, AA ;
Ninan, GK ;
Youngson, GG .
PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 17 (2-3) :125-128
[2]   The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT [J].
Choi, D ;
Park, H ;
Lee, YR ;
Kook, SH ;
Kim, SK ;
Kwag, HJ ;
Chung, EC .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2003, 44 (06) :574-582
[3]   Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis [J].
Eldar, S ;
Nash, E ;
Sabo, E ;
Matter, I ;
Kunin, J ;
Mogilner, JG ;
Abrahamson, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 173 (03) :194-198
[4]   Histologic severity of appendicitis can be predicted by computed tomography [J].
Hansen, AJ ;
Young, SW ;
De Petris, G ;
Tessier, DJ ;
Hernandez, JL ;
Johnson, DJ .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2004, 139 (12) :1304-1308
[5]  
Hosmer DW, 2000, APPL LOGISTIC REGRES, P288
[6]   Delay in surgery for acute appendicitis [J].
Maroju, NK ;
Smile, SR ;
Sistla, SC ;
Narasimhan, R ;
Sahai, A .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 74 (09) :773-776
[7]  
OWINGS MF, 1998, VITAL HLTH STAT, V13, P26
[8]   Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources [J].
Rao, PM ;
Rhea, JT ;
Novelline, RA ;
Mostafavi, AA ;
McCabe, CJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (03) :141-146
[9]   IS IT NECESSARY TO PERFORM APPENDECTOMY IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT IN CHILDREN [J].
SURANA, R ;
QUINN, F ;
PURI, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6886) :1168-1168
[10]   THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF APPENDICITIS IN ADULTS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
TEMPLE, CL ;
HUCHCROFT, SA ;
TEMPLE, WJ .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 221 (03) :278-281