Bottom Up Construction of a Personality Taxonomy

被引:51
作者
Condon, David M. [1 ]
Wood, Dustin [2 ]
Mottus, Rene [3 ,4 ]
Booth, Tom [3 ]
Costantini, Giulio [5 ]
Greiff, Samuel [6 ]
Johnson, Wendy [3 ]
Lukaszewski, Aaron [7 ]
Murray, Aja [3 ]
Revelle, William [8 ]
Wright, Aidan G. C. [9 ]
Ziegler, Matthias [10 ]
Zimmermann, Johannes [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Culverhouse Coll Business, Dept Management, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Tartu, Inst Psychol, Tartu, Estonia
[5] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Luxembourg, Dept Behav & Cognit Sci, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[7] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Dept Psychol, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
[8] Northwestern Univ, Dept Psychol, Evanston, IL USA
[9] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[10] Humboldt Univ, Dept Psychol, Berlin, Germany
[11] Univ Kassel, Dept Psychol, Kassel, Germany
关键词
personality assessment; taxonomy; nuances; hierarchy; survey methodology; HIGHER-ORDER FACTORS; BIG; 5; TRAITS; FACETS; STABILITY; BANDWIDTH; FIDELITY; RELIABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1027/1015-5759/a000626
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In pursuit of a more systematic and comprehensive framework for personality assessment, we introduce procedures for assessing personality traits at the lowest level: nuances. We argue that constructing a personality taxonomy from the bottom up addresses some of the limitations of extant top-down assessment frameworks (e.g., the Big Five), including the opportunity to resolve confusion about the breadth and scope of traits at different levels of the organization, evaluate unique and reliable trait variance at the item level, and clarify jingle/jangle issues in personality assessment. With a focus on applications in survey methodology and transparent documentation, our procedures contain six steps: (1) identification of a highly inclusive pool of candidate items, (2) programmatic evaluation and documentation of item characteristics, (3) test-retest analyses of items with adequate qualitative and quantitative properties, (4) analysis of cross-ratings from multiple raters for items with adequate retest reliability, (5) aggregation of ratings across diverse samples to evaluate generalizability across populations, (6) evaluations of predictive utility in various contexts. We hope these recommendations are the first step in a collaborative effort to identify a comprehensive pool of personality nuances at the lowest level, enabling subsequent construction of a robust hierarchy - from the bottom up.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 934
页数:12
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
Achaa-Amankwaa P., 2020, COFFEE TEA EXAMINING, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/dpqrx, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/DPQRX]
[2]  
Allport GW, 1936, PSYCHOL MONOGR, V47, P1
[3]   TRAITS REVISITED [J].
ALLPORT, GW .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1966, 21 (01) :1-+
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, J Pers, V60, P175
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1946, Description and measurement of personality
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1976, GROWING POINTS ETHOL
[7]   A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives [J].
Ashton, MC ;
Lee, K ;
Goldberg, LR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 87 (05) :707-721
[8]   A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages [J].
Ashton, MC ;
Lee, K ;
Perugini, M ;
Szarota, P ;
de Vries, RE ;
Di Blas, L ;
Boies, K ;
De Raad, B .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 86 (02) :356-366
[9]   Objections to theHEXACOModel of Personality Structure-And Why Those Objections Fail [J].
Ashton, Michael C. ;
Lee, Kibeom .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2020, 34 (04) :492-510
[10]   Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work? [J].
Azur, Melissa J. ;
Stuart, Elizabeth A. ;
Frangakis, Constantine ;
Leaf, Philip J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (01) :40-49