Trust and Distrust in e-Democracy

被引:3
作者
Duenas-Cid, David [1 ]
Janowski, Tomasz [1 ,2 ]
Krimmer, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Gdansk Univ Technol, Gdansk, Poland
[2] Danube Univ Krems, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
[3] Univ Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, DGO 2022: Intelligent Technologies, Governments and Citizens | 2022年
关键词
Trust; Distrust; e-Democracy; Internet Voting; Privacy; Security; Perception;
D O I
10.1145/3543434.3543637
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In the digital government research literature, the concept of trust is typically used as a precondition for the adoption of digital technology in the public sector or an outcome of a roadmap leading up to such adoption. The concept plays a central role in many decisions linked to the planning, adoption and management of the public sector technology. In contrast, the concept of distrust is almost neglected in such literature but, when approached, it appears as the opposite logical side of the trust-distrust dichotomy. However, we conjecture that the path to building trust is different than the path to building distrust and both concepts should be regarded as different theoretical constructs. The workshop aims to prove this conjecture drawing on the insights from the field of e-democracy including internet voting. Given its technical breadth, political and societal implications, and layers of complexity, e-democracy is a good benchmark for exploring this topic. The workshop will confront the main conjecture using examples, research and experiences contributed by participants, conceptual and methodological tools introduced by the organizers, and a discussion shared by everybody. The outcome - elements that help build trust or distrust in various forms of e-democracy - will have practical and theoretical implications, aiming at further research by the participants and collective publication of the results in a special issue in a top ranked journal, preferably Government Information Quarterly.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 488
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Alvarez R.M., 2004, Point, Click, and Vote: The Future of Internet Voting
[2]   Internet Voting Usefulness: An Empirical Analysis of Trust, Convenience and Accessibility [J].
Carter, Lemuria ;
Campbell, Ronald L. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND END USER COMPUTING, 2012, 24 (03) :1-17
[3]  
Gjosteen K., 2010, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-32747-6_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-32747-6_1]
[4]  
IDEA-International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2011, Introducing Electronic Voting: Essential Considerations.
[5]   Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization [J].
Janowski, Tomasz .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2015, 32 (03) :221-236
[6]   New methodology for calculating cost-efficiency of different ways of voting: is internet voting cheaper? [J].
Krimmer, Robert ;
Duenas-Cid, David ;
Krivonosova, Iuliia .
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 41 (01) :17-26
[7]  
Kulyk O., 2018, E-Vote-ID, P66
[8]   To i-vote or Not to i-vote: Drivers and Barriers to the Implementation of Internet Voting [J].
Licht, Nathan ;
Duenas-Cid, David ;
Krivonosova, Iuliia ;
Krimmer, Robert .
ELECTRONIC VOTING, E-VOTE-ID 2021, 2021, 12900 :91-105
[9]  
Luhmann N., 1979, TRUST POWER
[10]  
McKnight D. H., 2001, Trust in cyber-societies: Integrating the human and artificial perspectives, P27, DOI [DOI 10.1007/3-540-45547-73, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45547-73]