Direct comparison of additively manufactured porous titanium and tantalum implants towards in vivo osseointegration

被引:114
|
作者
Bandyopadhyay, Amit [1 ]
Mitra, Indranath [1 ]
Shivaram, Anish [1 ]
Dasgupta, Nairanjana [2 ]
Bose, Susmita [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Sch Mech & Mat Engn, WM Keck Biomed Mat Res Lab, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Tantalum; Porosity; Titanium; Titania nanotubes; Osseointegration; Bone-healing; BONE INGROWTH; PERFORMANCE; PROLIFERATION; METAL; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; OSTEOGENESIS; OSTEOBLASTS; FABRICATION; TI-6AL-4V;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.025
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Material properties of implants such as volume porosity and nanoscale surface modification have been shown to enhance cell-material interactions in vitro and osseointegration in vivo. Porous tantalum (Ta) and titanium (Ti) coatings are widely used for non-cemented implants, which are fabricated using different processing routes. In recent years, some of those implants are being manufactured using additive manufacturing. However, limited knowledge is available on direct comparison of additively manufactured porous Ta and Ti structures towards early stage osseointegration. In this study, we have fabricated porous Ta and Ti6Al4V (Ti64) implants using laser engineered net shaping (LENST) with similar volume fraction porosity to compare the influence of surface characteristics and material chemistry on in vivo response using a rat distal femur model for 5 and 12 weeks. We have also assessed whether surface modification on Ti64 can elicit similar in vivo response as porous Ta in a rat distal femur model for 5 and 12 weeks. The harvested implants were histologically analyzed for osteoid surface per bone surface. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) was done to assess the bone-implant interface. The results presented here indicate comparable performance of porous Ta and surface modified porous Ti64 implants towards early stage osseointegration at 5 weeks post implantation through seamless bone-material interlocking. However, a continued and extended efficacy of porous Ta is found in terms of higher osteoid formation at 12 weeks post-surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Additively manufactured porous tantalum implants
    Wauthle, Ruben
    van der Stok, Johan
    Yavari, Saber Amin
    Van Humbeeck, Jan
    Kruth, Jean-Pierre
    Zadpoor, Amir Abbas
    Weinans, Harrie
    Mulier, Michiel
    Schrooten, Jan
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2015, 14 : 217 - 225
  • [2] High-strength, porous additively manufactured implants with optimized mechanical osseointegration
    Kelly, Cambre N.
    Wang, Tian
    Crowley, James
    Wills, Dan
    Pelletier, Matthew H.
    Westrick, Edward R.
    Adams, Samuel B.
    Gall, Ken
    Walsh, William R.
    BIOMATERIALS, 2021, 279
  • [3] Functionality-packed additively manufactured porous titanium implants
    van Hengel, I. A. J.
    Gelderman, F. S. A.
    Athanasiadis, S.
    Minneboo, M.
    Weinans, H.
    Fluit, A. C.
    vander Eerden, B. C. J.
    Fratila-Apachitei, L. E.
    Apachitei, I
    Zadpoor, A. A.
    MATERIALS TODAY BIO, 2020, 7
  • [4] Osseointegration of porous titanium and tantalum implants in ovariectomized rabbits: A biomechanical study
    Bondarenko, Stanislav
    Filipenko, Volodymyr
    Karpinsky, Michael
    Karpinska, Olena
    Ivanov, Gennadiy
    Maltseva, Valentyna
    Badnaoui, Ahmed Amine
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 12 (04): : 214 - 222
  • [5] Biomechanical analysis of the osseointegration of porous tantalum implants
    Fraser, David
    Funkenbusch, Paul
    Ercoli, Carlo
    Meirelles, Luiz
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (06): : 811 - 820
  • [6] In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Bone Growth Characteristics in Additive-Manufactured Porous Titanium, Nonporous Titanium, and Porous Tantalum Interbody Cages
    Wu, Meng-Huang
    Lee, Ming-Hsueh
    Wu, Christopher
    Tsai, Pei-, I
    Hsu, Wei-Bin
    Huang, Shin-, I
    Lin, Tzu-Hung
    Yang, Kuo-Yi
    Chen, Chih-Yu
    Chen, Shih-Hao
    Lee, Ching-Yu
    Huang, Tsung-Jen
    Tsau, Fang-Hei
    Li, Yen-Yao
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (10)
  • [7] A comparison of biocompatibility and osseointegration of ceramic and titanium implants: an in vivo and in vitro study
    Moeller, B.
    Terheyden, H.
    Acil, Y.
    Purcz, N. M.
    Hertrampf, K.
    Tabakov, A.
    Behrens, E.
    Wiltfang, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (05) : 638 - 645
  • [8] In Vivo Bone Progression in and around Lattice Implants Additively Manufactured with a New Titanium Alloy
    Obaton, Anne-Francoise
    Fain, Jacques
    Meinel, Dietmar
    Tsamos, Athanasios
    Leonard, Fabien
    Lecuelle, Benoit
    Djemai, Madjid
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [9] A Novel Titanium Alloy for Additively Manufactured Orthopaedic Implants
    Alabort, Enrique
    Barba, Daniel
    De Diego, Alvaro
    Aguirre-Cebrian, Maria Vega
    Reed, Roger C.
    TMS 2020 149TH ANNUAL MEETING & EXHIBITION SUPPLEMENTAL PROCEEDINGS, 2020, : 267 - 276
  • [10] Toward Bactericidal Enhancement of Additively Manufactured Titanium Implants
    Fang, Yingjing
    Attarilar, Shokouh
    Yang, Zhi
    Wei, Guijiang
    Fu, Yuanfei
    Wang, Liqiang
    COATINGS, 2021, 11 (06)