What is the role of cemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty? The two-year results of a randomized RSA controlled trial

被引:21
|
作者
van Ooij, B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sierevelt, I. N. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
van der vis, H. M. [1 ,2 ]
Hoornenborg, D. [1 ,2 ]
Haverkamp, D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MC Slotervaart Xpert Clin Orthoped, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] SCORE Fdn, Specialized Ctr Orthoped Res & Educ, Xpert Clin Orthopedie, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Occupat Hlth Serv, Cohesie, Voorthuizen, Netherlands
[4] Spaarne Gasthuis Acad, Orthopaed Dept, Hoofddorp, Netherlands
关键词
ROENTGEN STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRIC ANALYSIS; THAN; 60; YEARS; TIBIAL COMPONENT; EARLY MIGRATION; FOLLOW-UP; REPLACEMENT; STABILIZATION; SURVIVAL; MINIMUM; TKA;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0788.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims For many designs of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) it remains unclear whether cemented or uncemented fixation provides optimal long-term survival. The main limitation in most studies is a retrospective or non-comparative study design. The same is true for comparative trials looking only at the survival rate as extensive sample sizes are needed to detect true differences in fixation and durability. Studies using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) techniques have shown to be highly predictive in detecting late occurring aseptic loosening at an early stage. To investigate the difference in predicted long-term survival between cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of TKA, we performed a randomized controlled trial using RSA. Methods A total of 105 patients were randomized into three groups (cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS Mobile Bearing (ACS MB) knee system, implantcast). RSA examinations were performed on the first day after surgery and at scheduled follow-up visits at three months, six months, one year, and two years postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained preoperatively and after two years follow-up. Patients and follow-up investigators were blinded for the result of randomization. Results RSA secondary stabilization did not show a significant difference between the three types of fixation. A maximum total point motion of less than 0.2 mm in the second postoperative year was shown in each group, which suggests stabilization of the implant. At 24 months after surgery, PROMs significantly improved compared to baseline in all treatment groups. No significant difference was observed between the three groups. Conclusion Secondary stabilization measurements in this study demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. In all groups migration stabilized after initial settling of the implant. For this implant the long-term outcome is not expected to be influenced by the type of fixation to the bone.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 104
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of tourniquet use on fixation quality in cemented total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized clinical controlled RSA trial
    Molt, Mats
    Harsten, Andreas
    Toksvig-Larsen, Soren
    KNEE, 2014, 21 (02) : 396 - 401
  • [2] Migration of a novel 3D-printed cementless versus a cemented total knee arthroplasty: two-year results of a randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis
    Hasan, S.
    van Hamersveld, K. T.
    Marang-van de Mheen, P. J.
    Kaptein, B. L.
    Nelissen, R. G. H. H.
    Toksvig-Larsen, S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (08) : 1016 - 1024
  • [3] To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
    Fricka, Kevin B.
    Sritulanondha, Supatra
    McAsey, Craig J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (09) : 55 - 58
  • [4] A randomized controlled trial comparing two-year postoperative femoral and tibial migration of a new and an established cementless rotating platform total knee arthroplasty
    Koster, L. A.
    Rassir, R.
    Kaptein, B. L.
    Sierevelt, I. N.
    Schager, M.
    Nelissen, R. G. H. H.
    Nolte, P. A.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2023, 105B (02) : 148 - 157
  • [5] Cementless and Cemented Dual-Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Comparison With a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up
    Meding, John B.
    Meding, Lindsey K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (06) : S151 - S156
  • [6] Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Cementless vs. Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
    Zhao, Enze
    Zhu, Xiaoyan
    Tang, Haiwei
    Luo, Zhenyu
    Zeng, Weinan
    Zhou, Zongke
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (11) : 2671 - 2679
  • [7] Early Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Partial Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Sershon, Robert A.
    Fricka, Kevin B.
    Hamilton, William G.
    Nam, Dennis
    Parks, Nancy L.
    DeBenedetti, Anne
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (06) : S94 - S97
  • [8] Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional versus enhanced-fixation designs of a novel cemented total knee arthroplasty tibial component
    Turgeon, T. R.
    Vasarhelyi, E.
    Howard, J.
    Teeter, M.
    Righolt, C. H.
    Gascoyne, T.
    Bohm, E.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2024, 5 (01): : 20 - 27
  • [9] To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Fricka, Kevin B.
    McAsey, Craig J.
    Sritulanondha, Supatra
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (07) : S183 - S187
  • [10] Functional results of total-knee arthroplasty versus medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: two-year results of a randomised, assessor-blinded multicentre trial
    Knifsund, Jani
    Niinimaki, Tuukka
    Nurmi, Heikki
    Toom, Alar
    Keemu, Hannes
    Laaksonen, Inari
    Seppanen, Matti
    Liukas, Antti
    Pamilo, Konsta
    Vahlberg, T.
    Aarimaa, Ville
    Makela, K. T.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (06):