Strength of Single- Versus Double-Anchor Repair of Type II SLAP Lesions: A Cadaveric Study

被引:15
作者
Baldini, Todd [1 ]
Snyder, R. Lance [1 ]
Peacher, Gabby [1 ]
Bach, Joel [1 ,2 ]
McCarty, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Orthopaed, Golden, CO USA
[2] Colorado Sch Mines, Div Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
SLAP lesion repair; Shoulder arthroscopy; Suture anchor; IISLAP LESIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2009.05.017
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This study was designed to examine whether there was a difference in pullout strength along with the mode of failure between I suture anchor and 2 suture anchors. Methods: Ten matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders were used in the study. A type II SLAP lesion, according to the classification of Snyder et al., was created. In 10 shoulders I anchor with 2 sutures was used to repair the lesion. In the other group of 10 matched shoulders, fixation was done with 2 anchors, with each anchor having only I suture. An Instron servohydraulic test machine (Instron, Canton, MA) was used to pull the long head of the biceps tendon until failure occurred. Results: The single-anchor group failed at a mean load of 278.5 +/- 101.5 N. The double-anchor group failed at 242.5 +/- 96.5 N. A paired 2-sample Student t test showed that there was no significant difference in pullout strength between the 2 groups (P = .090). The most common mode of failure was soft-tissue failure. There was I anchor pullout in the single-anchor group and 2 anchor pullouts in the double-anchor group. Conclusions: The results of this study imply that using I anchor with 2 sutures is biomechanically equivalent to 2 anchors with I suture each for repairing type II SLAP lesions. Clinical Relevance: Using I suture anchor is sufficient to repair a type II SLAP lesion.
引用
收藏
页码:1257 / 1260
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Outcomes of isolated type IISLAP lesions treated with arthroscopic fixation using a bioabsorbable tack [J].
Cohen, DB ;
Coleman, S ;
Drakos, MC ;
Allen, AA ;
O'Brien, SJ ;
Altchek, DW ;
Warren, RF .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (02) :136-142
[2]   A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques for type IISLAP lesions [J].
DiRaimondo, CA ;
Alexander, JW ;
Noble, PC ;
Lowe, WR ;
Lintner, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (03) :727-733
[3]   Biomechanical comparison of 3 suture anchor configurations for repair of type II SLAP lesions [J].
Domb, Benjamin G. ;
Ehteshami, John R. ;
Shindle, Michael K. ;
Gulotta, Lawrence ;
Zoghi-Moghadam, Mohamad ;
MacGillivray, John D. ;
Altchek, David W. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (02) :135-140
[4]  
SNYDER S J, 1990, Arthroscopy, V6, P274, DOI 10.1016/0749-8063(90)90056-J
[5]  
Snyder S J, 1995, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V4, P243, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80015-1
[6]   Lasso repair of SLAP or Bankart lesions: A new arthroscopic technique [J].
Wolf, BR ;
Selby, RM ;
Dunn, WR ;
MacGillivray, JD .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2004, 20 (06) :125-128
[7]   A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques in posterior type II superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions [J].
Yoo, Jae Chul ;
Ahn, Jin Hwan ;
Lee, Sang Hak ;
Lim, Hong Chul ;
Choi, Kui Won ;
Bae, Tae Soo ;
Yang, Chang .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2008, 17 (01) :144-149