On the impact of nuclear data uncertainties on LWR neutron dosimetry assessments

被引:0
|
作者
Vasiliev, Alexander [1 ]
Pecchia, Marco [1 ]
Rochman, Dimitri [1 ]
Ferroukhi, Hakim [1 ]
Alhassan, Erwin [1 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst PSI, Lab Reactor Phys & Thermal Hydraul LRT, Forsch Str 111, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
关键词
PWR; METHODOLOGY; VALIDATION; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1051/epjconf/202023922003
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
In this work, an overview on the relevance of the nuclear data (ND) uncertainties with respect to the Light Water Reactors (LWR) neutron dosimetry is presented. The paper summarizes results of several studies realized at the LRT laboratory of the Paul Scherrer Institute over the past decade. The studies were done using the base LRT calculation methodology for dosimetry assessments, which involves the neutron source distribution representation, obtained based on validated CASMO/SIMULATE core follow calculation models, and the subsequent neutron transport simulations with the MCNP (R) software, The methodology was validated using as reference data results of numerous measurement programs fulfilled at Swiss NPPs. Namely, the following experimental programs are considered in the given overview: PWR "gradient probes" and BWR fast neutron fluence (FNF) monitors post irradiation examination (PIE). For the both cases, assessments of the nuclear data related uncertainties were performed. When appropriate, a cross-verification of the deterministic and stochastic based uncertainty propagation techniques is provided. Furthermore, the observations on which particular neutron induced reactions contribute dominantly to the overall ND-related uncertainties are demonstrated. The presented results should help with assessing the overall impact of the various nuclear data uncertainties with respect to dosimetry applications and provide relevant feedback to the nuclear data evaluators,
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the options for incorporating nuclear data uncertainties in criticality safety assessments for LWR fuel
    Vasiliev, A.
    Rochman, D.
    Pecchia, M.
    Ferroukhi, H.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2018, 116 : 57 - 68
  • [2] Uncertainties for Swiss LWR spent nuclear fuels due to nuclear data
    Rochman, Dimitri A.
    Vasiliev, Alexander
    Dokhane, Abdelhamid
    Ferroukhi, Hakim
    EPJ NUCLEAR SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 4
  • [3] UNCERTAINTIES IN NUCLEAR-DATA PROCESSING AND REDUCTION PROCEDURES FOR LWR APPLICATIONS
    OZER, O
    EICH, WJ
    MOSTELLER, RD
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1981, 39 : 919 - 920
  • [4] Neutron and non-neutron nuclear data for radiation dosimetry
    Holden, NE
    REACTOR DOSIMETRY: RADIATION METROLOGY AND ASSESSMENT, 2001, 1398 : 425 - 430
  • [5] Nuclear Data Uncertainties for Typical LWR Fuel Assemblies and a Simple Reactor Core
    Rochman, D.
    Leray, O.
    Hursin, M.
    Ferroukhi, H.
    Vasiliev, A.
    Aures, A.
    Bostelmann, F.
    Zwermann, W.
    Cabellos, O.
    Diez, C. J.
    Dyrda, J.
    Garcia-Herranz, N.
    Castro, E.
    van der Marck, S.
    Sjostrand, H.
    Hernandez, A.
    Fleming, M.
    Sublet, J. -Ch.
    Fiorito, L.
    NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS, 2017, 139 : 1 - 76
  • [6] NEUTRON DOSIMETRY WITH NUCLEAR-EMULSIONS
    HOFERT, M
    PIESCH, E
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1985, 10 (1-4) : 189 - 195
  • [7] SENSITIVITY OF ALTERNATIVE LWR FUEL-CYCLES TO DATA UNCERTAINTIES
    QUAN, B
    CHEN, C
    HARRIS, D
    BECKER, M
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1979, 32 (JUN): : 762 - 763
  • [8] NUCLEAR DATA NEEDS FOR LWR APPLICATIONS.
    Ozer, Odelli
    National Bureau of Standards, Special Publication, 1979, : 1 - 5
  • [9] Radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear cardiology: Radiation dosimetry, uncertainties, and risk
    Stabin, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 49 (09) : 1555 - 1563
  • [10] Reactor pressure vessel neutron dosimetry assessments for UKPWR plant
    Thornton, DA
    Lewis, TA
    Mossop, JR
    Page, CJ
    Haddock, SA
    REACTOR DOSIMETRY: RADIATION METROLOGY AND ASSESSMENT, 2001, 1398 : 38 - 45