Mind wandering increases linearly with text difficulty

被引:20
作者
Kahmann, Rebecca [1 ]
Ozuer, Yesim [1 ]
Zedelius, Claire M. [2 ]
Bijleveld, Erik [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Behav Sci, POB 9104, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
来源
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG | 2022年 / 86卷 / 01期
关键词
TASK; AVOIDANCE; ATTENTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00426-021-01483-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although mind wandering during reading is known to be affected by text difficulty, the nature of this relationship is not yet fully understood. To examine this issue, we conducted an experiment in which participants read non-fiction texts that varied along five levels of difficulty under naturalistic conditions. Difficulty levels were determined based on Flesch-Kincaid Grade Levels and verified with Coh-Metrix indices. Mind wandering was measured with thought probes. We predicted that text difficulty and mind wandering have a U-shaped (i.e., quadratic) relationship. Contrary to our expectations, but in line with some prior studies, mind wandering linearly increased with text difficulty. Additionally, text interest moderated the effect of text difficulty on mind wandering. Finally, mind wandering was associated with worse performance on a comprehension test. Together, our findings extend previous work by showing that (a) a linear relationship between difficulty and mind wandering exists during common page-by-page reading of pre-existing texts and that (b) this relationship holds across a broad range of difficulty levels.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 293
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Neural correlates of effort-based valuation with prospective choices [J].
Aridan, Nadav ;
Malecek, Nicholas J. ;
Poldrack, Russell A. ;
Schonberg, Tom .
NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 185 :446-454
[2]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[3]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[4]   The feeling of effort during mental activity [J].
Bijleveld, Erik .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2018, 63 :218-227
[5]   Early event-related brain potentials and hemispheric asymmetries reveal mind-wandering while reading and predict comprehension [J].
Broadway, James M. ;
Franklin, Michael S. ;
Schooler, Jonathan W. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 107 :31-43
[6]   Mind Wandering, Motivation, and Task Performance Over Time: Evidence That Motivation Insulates People From the Negative Effects of Mind Wandering [J].
Brosowsky, Nicholaus P. ;
DeGutis, Joseph ;
Esterman, Mike ;
Smilek, Daniel ;
Seli, Paul .
PSYCHOLOGY OF CONSCIOUSNESS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 10 (04) :475-486
[7]   Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method [J].
Cousineau, Denis .
TUTORIALS IN QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 1 (01) :42-45
[8]   Labor/leisure decisions in their natural context: The case of the smartphone [J].
Dora, Jonas ;
van Hooff, Madelon ;
Geurts, Sabine ;
Kompier, Michiel ;
Bijleveld, Erik .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2021, 28 (02) :676-685
[9]  
Dufty D.F., 2006, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, P1251
[10]   Metacognitive Evaluation in the Avoidance of Demand [J].
Dunn, Timothy L. ;
Lutes, David J. C. ;
Risko, Evan F. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2016, 42 (09) :1372-1387