Critical Analysis of Coal Life Cycle Using the Life Cycle Assessment

被引:0
作者
Dinca, Cristian [1 ]
Badea, Adrian [1 ]
Apostol, Tiberiu [1 ]
Marculescu, Cosmin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politehn Bucuresti, Dept Power Engn, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania
来源
PROGRESS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL II, PTS A AND B | 2009年
关键词
coal; monitoring emissions; power plant; energy; LCA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coal has the largest share of utility power generation in the Romania, accounting for approximately 40% of all utility-produced electricity. Therefore, understanding the environmental implications of producing electricity from coal is an important component of any plan to reduce total emissions and resource consumption. Three systems were examined: a) a plant that represents the average emissions and efficiency of currently operating coal-fired power plants in the Romania; b) a new coal-fired power plant that meets the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS); c) a highly advanced coal-fired power plant utilizing a low emission boiler system (LEBS). The results are then used to evaluate the environmental impacts of the process so that efforts can be focused on mitigating possible effects. Each system analyzed consists of coal mining, transportation, and electricity generation. In keeping with the cradle-to-grave concept of LCA, upstream processes required for the operation of these three subsystems were also included in this study. As expected, because coal combustion results in the production of CO(2) from carbon that was previously sequestered underground, CO(2) accounts for the vast majority (98%-99% by weight) of the total air emissions from each system examined. The rate of production is 1,022 g/kWh, 941 g/kWh, and 741 g/kWh for the Average, NSPS, and LEBS systems, respectively. Two other climate change gases, methane and nitrous oxide, are also emitted from the system. Although the global warming potential (GWP) of these gases is much higher than that of CO(2), they are emitted in much smaller quantities and therefore do not significantly change the GWP of the overall systems. Apart from the CO(2) produced during coal combustion, operations related to flue gas clean-up produce more CO(2) than any other upstream process. Limestone production, transportation, and use account for 59% and 62% of the non-coal CO(2) emissions in the Average and NSPS systems. These amounts are greater than twice the CO(2) emissions related to transportation of the coal. In the LEBS system, operations associated with the production and use of natural gas to regenerate the CuO sorbent is responsible for 35% of the total non-coal CO(2) emissions. Coal transportation, in this system, produces nearly 40% of the non-coal CO(2).
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 586
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating life cycle assessment and environmental risk assessment: A critical review
    Muazu, Rukayya Ibrahim
    Rothman, Rachael
    Maltby, Lorraine
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 293
  • [32] Life cycle assessment of transformation from a sub-critical power plant into a polygeneration plant
    Yu, Peng
    Luo, Zhongyang
    Wang, Qinhui
    Fang, Mengxiang
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 198
  • [33] Impact Analysis Using Life Cycle Assessment of Asphalt Production from Primary Data
    Sollazzo, Giuseppe
    Longo, Sonia
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Celauro, Clara
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) : 1 - 21
  • [34] Critical Review of Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production Pathways
    Maniscalco, Manfredi Picciotto
    Longo, Sonia
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Micciche, Gabriele
    Ferraro, Marco
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 11 (06)
  • [35] Application of Life Cycle Assessment in the pharmaceutical industry: A critical review
    Chen, Zhengyun
    Lian, Justin Z.
    Zhu, Hengyi
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Zhang, Yulong
    Xiang, Xinyu
    Huang, Dechun
    Tjokro, Kristie
    Barbarossa, Valerio
    Cucurachi, Stefano
    Dong, Bin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 459
  • [36] Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment
    Hottle, Troy A.
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    Landis, Amy E.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 122 : 295 - 306
  • [37] Life Cycle Assessment Application to the Wine Sector: A Critical Review
    Ferrara, Carmen
    De Feo, Giovanni
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (02)
  • [38] Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of a 40 MW wind farm with consideration of the infrastructure
    Li, Qiangfeng
    Duan, Huabo
    Xie, Minghui
    Kang, Peng
    Ma, Yi
    Zhong, Ruoyu
    Gao, Tianming
    Zhong, Weiqiong
    Wen, Bojie
    Bai, Feng
    Vuppaladadiyam, Arun K.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 138
  • [39] The recycling of oyster shells: An environmental analysis using Life Cycle Assessment
    Freitas de Alvarenga, Rodrigo Augusto
    Galindro, Bruno Menezes
    Helpa, Camile de Fatima
    Soares, Sebastiao Roberto
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 106 : 102 - 109
  • [40] Life cycle assessment of end-of-life engineered wood
    Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan
    Tokede, Olubukola
    Tao, Zhong
    Ashraf, Mahmud
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 887