Critical Analysis of Coal Life Cycle Using the Life Cycle Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Dinca, Cristian [1 ]
Badea, Adrian [1 ]
Apostol, Tiberiu [1 ]
Marculescu, Cosmin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politehn Bucuresti, Dept Power Engn, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania
来源
PROGRESS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL II, PTS A AND B | 2009年
关键词
coal; monitoring emissions; power plant; energy; LCA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coal has the largest share of utility power generation in the Romania, accounting for approximately 40% of all utility-produced electricity. Therefore, understanding the environmental implications of producing electricity from coal is an important component of any plan to reduce total emissions and resource consumption. Three systems were examined: a) a plant that represents the average emissions and efficiency of currently operating coal-fired power plants in the Romania; b) a new coal-fired power plant that meets the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS); c) a highly advanced coal-fired power plant utilizing a low emission boiler system (LEBS). The results are then used to evaluate the environmental impacts of the process so that efforts can be focused on mitigating possible effects. Each system analyzed consists of coal mining, transportation, and electricity generation. In keeping with the cradle-to-grave concept of LCA, upstream processes required for the operation of these three subsystems were also included in this study. As expected, because coal combustion results in the production of CO(2) from carbon that was previously sequestered underground, CO(2) accounts for the vast majority (98%-99% by weight) of the total air emissions from each system examined. The rate of production is 1,022 g/kWh, 941 g/kWh, and 741 g/kWh for the Average, NSPS, and LEBS systems, respectively. Two other climate change gases, methane and nitrous oxide, are also emitted from the system. Although the global warming potential (GWP) of these gases is much higher than that of CO(2), they are emitted in much smaller quantities and therefore do not significantly change the GWP of the overall systems. Apart from the CO(2) produced during coal combustion, operations related to flue gas clean-up produce more CO(2) than any other upstream process. Limestone production, transportation, and use account for 59% and 62% of the non-coal CO(2) emissions in the Average and NSPS systems. These amounts are greater than twice the CO(2) emissions related to transportation of the coal. In the LEBS system, operations associated with the production and use of natural gas to regenerate the CuO sorbent is responsible for 35% of the total non-coal CO(2) emissions. Coal transportation, in this system, produces nearly 40% of the non-coal CO(2).
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 586
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A critical perspective on uncertainty appraisal and sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment
    Lo Piano, Samuele
    Benini, Lorenzo
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2022, 26 (03) : 763 - 781
  • [22] Life cycle energy analysis and environmental life cycle assessment of carbon nanofibers production
    Khanna, Vikas
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    Lee, L. James
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2007, : 128 - +
  • [23] Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of Jatropha biodiesel production in China
    Liu, Yanbing
    Zhu, Zongyuan
    Zhang, Rui
    Zhao, Xubo
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2022, 14 (22) : 28635 - 28660
  • [24] Review of methodology for life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of asphalt pavements
    Suwarto, Fardzanela
    Parry, Tony
    Airey, Gordon
    ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2024, 25 (08) : 1631 - 1657
  • [25] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Magnesia Spinel Brick Production
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Tok, Gulden
    Karacasulu, Levent
    Metesoy, Melike
    Banar, Mufide
    Kara, Alpagut
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (07):
  • [26] Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis for airfield pavement: a review article
    Orabi, Joumana
    Shatila, Walid
    INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2024, 9 (06)
  • [27] An integrated life cycle assessment and life cycle analysis model for pavement overlay systems
    Zhang, H.
    Keoleian, G. A.
    Lepech, M. D.
    LIFE-CYCLE CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2008, : 907 - +
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage systems: Critical review of life cycle inventories
    Duval-Dachary, S.
    Beauchet, S.
    Lorne, D.
    Salou, T.
    Helias, A.
    Pastor, A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 183
  • [29] Life cycle assessment
    Duda, M
    Shaw, JS
    SOCIETY, 1997, 35 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [30] Life cycle assessment
    Teulon, Helene
    Boidot-Forget, Marc
    Epelly, Olivier
    Automotive Engineering International, 1995, 103 (12): : 49 - 51