Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Winter Wheat Waterlogging in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River, China

被引:25
作者
Chen, Yuanyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Jingfeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Song, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gao, Ping [4 ]
Wan, Suqin [5 ]
Shi, Lei [6 ]
Wang, Xiuzhen [7 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Remote Sensing & Informat Technol Applicat, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Key Lab Agr Remote Sensing & Informat Syst, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Minist Educ, Key Lab Environm Remediat & Ecol Hlth, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Meteorol Bur, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] China Meteorol Adm, Wuhan Reg Climate Ctr, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[6] Meteorol Informat Ctr Anhui Prov, Hefei 230031, Anhui, Peoples R China
[7] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Inst Remote Sensing & Earth Sci, Hangzhou 311121, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LAND-SURFACE MODEL; CROP GROWTH; EXTREME PRECIPITATION; DROUGHT; YIELD; TOLERANCE; BASIN; SALINITY; HYPOXIA; PERIOD;
D O I
10.1155/2018/3542103
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The waterlogging is a serious agrometeorological disaster caused by excessive soil water during crop growth stages. The middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River are one of the major winter wheat growing regions in China and at the same time they are waterlogging-prone due to their specific climatic conditions. In this study, we integrated a set of tools to analyze the spatiotemporal features of winter wheat waterlogging in this region. We proposed a waterlogging precipitation index (WPI) based on winter wheat yield loss rate and precipitation anomaly percentage and analyzed the frequency, scope, and intensity of winter wheat waterlogging. The results showed that the spring rainfall had a direct and significant effect on winter wheat yield, and the meteorological yield of winter wheat was negatively correlated with precipitation abnormal event from jointing to maturity stages (March to May) across the whole study area. The matching between the waterlogging severity identified by the WPI and historical winter wheat waterlogging records was relatively high. We also discussed the influences of the other nonmeteorological factors, for example, soil texture, topographic and geomorphic conditions, and local disaster-resisting ability, on the extent of waterlogging damage.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SL4242008
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 1072009 QXT
[3]   Critical period for grain number establishment of near isogenic lines of two- and six-rowed barley [J].
Arisnabarreta, Sebastian ;
Miralles, Daniel J. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2008, 107 (03) :196-202
[4]   Flooding stress: Acclimations and genetic diversity [J].
Bailey-Serres, J. ;
Voesenek, L. A. C. J. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2008, 59 :313-339
[5]   The interaction between waterlogging and salinity in higher plants: causes, consequences and implications [J].
Barrett-Lennard, EG .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2003, 253 (01) :35-54
[6]   The importance of the period immediately preceding anthesis for grain weight determination in wheat [J].
Calderini, DF ;
Savin, R ;
Abeledo, LG ;
Reynolds, MP ;
Slafer, GA .
EUPHYTICA, 2001, 119 (1-2) :199-204
[7]   EFFECTS OF WATERLOGGING AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF WINTER-WHEAT [J].
CANNELL, RQ ;
BELFORD, RK ;
GALES, K ;
DENNIS, CW ;
PREW, RD .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1980, 31 (02) :117-132
[8]   Spectrum efficiency of nested sparse sampling and coprime sampling [J].
Chen, Junjie ;
Liang, Qilian ;
Zhang, Baoju ;
Wu, Xiaorong .
EURASIP JOURNAL ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, 2013,
[9]   Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments [J].
Colmer, T. D. ;
Voesenek, L. A. C. J. .
FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2009, 36 (08) :665-681
[10]   Adverse effect of waterlogging and soil salinity on crop and land productivity in northwest region of Haryana, India [J].
Datta, KK ;
de Jong, C .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2002, 57 (03) :223-238