Evaluation of Non-Carbon Adsorbents for the Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted from Laundry Facilities

被引:1
作者
Kim, Doah [1 ]
Park, Jeong Min [1 ]
Lee, Sang-Sup [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Cheongju, South Korea
关键词
VOCs; Dry cleaning; Adsorption; Desorption; Adsorbent;
D O I
10.5572/KOSAE.2021.37.1.091
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emitted from various sources. Laundry facilities are one of the emission sources located near a residential area. Especially, a high concentration of VOCs is emitted during a dry cleaning process in the laundry facility. An adsorption method has been used for the removal of VOCs from an exhaust gas. Although a carbonaceous adsorbent has been used for VOCs removal, it has a risk of fire and explosion. In this study, non-carbon adsorbents such as mesoporous silica (MCM-41, SBA-15 and KIT-6), activated alumina and aluminum silicate were tested for the adsorption of VOCs from the organic solvent used in the dry cleaning process. A fixed-bed reactor system was used for the adsorption tests at 30 degrees C. The inlet concentration of the solvent vapor was 2,000 ppm (+/- 10%). For some tests, 0.8% water vapor was also injected to investigate the effect of water vapor on the adsorption capacity and the desorption efficiency of the adsorbent. Desorption tests were conducted by injecting fresh air at 30 degrees C after the adsorption tests. Activated alumina was found to be a regenerable adsorbent. Although activated alumina also showed a high adsorption capacity without the injection of water vapor, it showed a significant decrease in the adsorption capacity with the injection of water vapor. MCM-41, SBA-15 and KIT-6 showed lower desorption efficiencies than activated alumina. Considering the high costs of MCM-41, SBA-15 and KIT-6, those adsorbents may not be applicable the removal of VOCs from the dry cleaning process.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 101
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Adsorption performance of VOCs in ordered mesoporous silicas with different pore structures and surface chemistry
    Dou, Baojuan
    Hu, Qin
    Li, Jinjun
    Qiao, Shizhang
    Hao, Zhengping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 186 (2-3) : 1615 - 1624
  • [2] Jeong J., 2003, ASSESSMENT EXPOSURE
  • [3] Improving discrimination ability of convolutional neural networks by hybrid learning
    Kim, In-Jung
    Choi, Changbeom
    Lee, Sang-Heon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON DOCUMENT ANALYSIS AND RECOGNITION, 2016, 19 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [4] Kim S. Y, 2001, J KOSAE, V17, P233
  • [5] Effect of pore structure in mesoporous silicas on VOC dynamic adsorption/desorption performance
    Kosuge, Katsunori
    Kubo, Shiori
    Kikukawa, Nobuyuki
    Takemori, Makoto
    [J]. LANGMUIR, 2007, 23 (06) : 3095 - 3102
  • [6] Lee H.J., 2020, ORGANIC COMPOUNDS EM
  • [7] Estimation of Emissions and Emission Factor of Volatile Organic Compounds from Small-scale Dry Cleaning Operations Using Organic Solvents
    Lee, Hyeonji
    Song, Muguen
    Kim, Daekeun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 35 (04) : 413 - 422
  • [8] 이승재, 2009, [Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, 대한환경공학회지], V31, P1025
  • [9] Mijin Jeon, 2018, [JOURNAL OF KOREA SOCIETY OF WASTE MANAGEMENT, 한국폐기물자원순환학회지], V35, P499, DOI 10.9786/kswm.2018.35.6.499
  • [10] Park Ok-hyun, 2016, [Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 한국산업보건학회지], V26, P159