Palaeo-stress regimes and structural framework during the Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Crimean Mountains (the northern margin of the Black Sea)

被引:2
作者
Korniyenko-Sheremet, Yevgeniya [1 ]
Sosson, Marc [1 ]
Murovskaya, Anna [2 ]
Gobarenko, Valentina [3 ]
Yegorova, Tamara [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cote Azur, CNRS, Observ Cote Azur, IRD,Geoazur, 250 Rue A Einstein, F-06560 Valbonne, France
[2] Natl Acad Sci Ukraine, Inst Geophys, Pr Palladina 32, UA-03680 Kiev, Ukraine
[3] VI Vernadsky Crimean Fed Univ, Inst Seismol & Geodynam, Simferopol, Crimea, Ukraine
关键词
Crimean Mountains; Black Sea; Palaeo-stress; Tectonic evolution; Structural analysis; CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; GREATER CAUCASUS; CENTRAL PONTIDES; TOMOGRAPHY MODEL; BASINS STRUCTURE; SOUTHERN CRIMEA; HISTORY; DEFORMATION; COLLISION; INVERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104704
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This paper presents a chronology of tectonic events in the Crimean Mountains (CM) based on a micro- (palaeostress) and macro-scale (tectonic structures) structural analysis since the Cretaceous. Recent studies have attempted to fit the geology of the CM into the geodynamic context of the subduction of the Neotethys plate beneath the Eurasian margin; however, these attempts remain difficult and controversial as they are based dominantly on stratigraphic analysis. New structural analysis results indicate that structural development within the CM was largely determined by the influence of pre-existing structures that occurred long before the Cretaceous rifting in the Black Sea (BS). This could explain the features of the geological structure in the Western and Eastern CM separated by the Alushta-Simferopol Fault Zone (ASFZ). New palaeo-stress analysis allows us to identify the trends and timing of the Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic deformations with greater precision. Superimposing the low-magnitude seismicity (M <= 3) with structures defined on the established geological crosssections permit the localization of currently active structures. Considering both recent scientific achievements concerning the geology of the CM and the results of this study, we propose a qualitative model of the formation of the BS Basin and its inversion in the context of the BS-Greater Caucasus (GC). In this model, the Shatsky Ridge (ShR), moving to the north, acts as an indenter deforming the CM and the GC. The results are of practical importance for geodynamic modelling and hydrocarbon exploration.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 178 条
[1]  
Abashin A.A., 1982, TEKTONIKA STRATIGRAF, V2, P35
[2]  
Adamia S., 1974, Geotektonika, V1, P78
[3]   TECTONICS OF THE CAUCASUS AND ADJOINING REGIONS - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE TETHYS OCEAN [J].
ADAMIA, SA ;
CHKHOTUA, T ;
KEKELIA, M ;
LORDKIPANIDZE, M ;
SHAVISHVILI, I ;
ZAKARIADZE, G .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY, 1981, 3 (04) :437-447
[4]  
Adamia S, 2010, GEOL SOC SPEC PUBL, V340, P239, DOI 10.1144/SP340.11
[5]   Geology of the Caucasus: A Review [J].
Adamia, Shota ;
Zakariadze, Guram ;
Chkhotua, Tamar ;
Sadradze, Nino ;
Tsereteli, Nino ;
Chabukiani, Aleksandre ;
Gventsadze, Aleksandre .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2011, 20 (05) :489-544
[6]  
Alekseev A.S., 2005, Bull Mosk Ob Isp Prirody Otd Geol, V80, P80
[7]  
Almendinger R.W., 2012, STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY A, P289
[8]  
ANGELIER J, 1994, CR ACAD SCI II, V319, P341
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1984, INT GEOL REV
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, GEOPHYS J+