Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering

被引:50
作者
Dudukovic, Nicole M. [1 ]
DuBrow, Sarah [1 ]
Wagner, Anthony D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
DIVIDED ATTENTION; RECOGNITION MEMORY; TEST TRIALS; MODELS; RETENTION; RECALL; DEPTH;
D O I
10.3758/MC.37.7.953
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Memory retrieval is a powerful learning event that influences whether an experience will be remembered in the future. Although retrieval can succeed in the presence of distraction, dividing attention during retrieval may reduce the power of remembering as an encoding event. In the present experiments, participants studied pictures of objects under full attention and then engaged in item recognition and source memory retrieval under full or divided attention. Two days later, a second recognition and source recollection test assessed the impact of attention during initial retrieval on long-term retention. On this latter test, performance was superior for items that had been tested initially under full versus divided attention. More importantly, even when items were correctly recognized on the first test, divided attention reduced the likelihood of subsequent recognition on the second test. The same held true for source recollection. Additionally, foils presented during the first test were also less likely to be later recognized if they had been encountered initially under divided attention. These findings demonstrate that attentive retrieval is critical for learning through remembering.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 961
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   ATTENTION AND RETRIEVAL FROM LONG-TERM-MEMORY [J].
BADDELEY, A ;
LEWIS, V ;
ELDRIDGE, M ;
THOMSON, N .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1984, 113 (04) :518-540
[2]   MULTINOMIAL PROCESSING MODELS OF SOURCE MONITORING [J].
BATCHELDER, WH ;
RIEFER, DM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 97 (04) :548-564
[3]   Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring [J].
Bayen, UJ ;
Murnane, K ;
Erdfelder, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (01) :197-215
[4]   When additional multiple-choice lures aid versus hinder later memory [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Marsh, Elizabeth J. ;
Goode, Michael K. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 20 (07) :941-956
[5]   THE INFLUENCE OF RETRIEVAL ON RETENTION [J].
CARRIER, M ;
PASHLER, H .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1992, 20 (06) :633-642
[6]   The testing effect in recognition memory: A dual process account [J].
Chan, Jason C. K. ;
McDermott, Kathleen B. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (02) :431-437
[7]   The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory [J].
Craik, FIM ;
Govoni, R ;
NavehBenjamin, M ;
Anderson, ND .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1996, 125 (02) :159-180
[8]   Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding [J].
Fernandes, MA ;
Moscovitch, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2000, 129 (02) :155-176
[9]   Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words [J].
Fernandes, MA ;
Moscovitch, M .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2002, 30 (05) :731-744
[10]   Interference effects from divided attention during retrieval in younger and older adults [J].
Fernandes, MA ;
Moscovitch, M .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2003, 18 (02) :219-230