Timing of Adverse Prostate Cancer Reclassification on First Surveillance Biopsy: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study

被引:15
|
作者
Macleod, Liam C. [1 ]
Ellis, William J. [1 ,3 ]
Newcomb, Lisa F. [1 ]
Zheng, Yingye [3 ]
Brooks, James D. [4 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [5 ]
Gleave, Martin E. [6 ]
Lance, Raymond S. [7 ]
Nelson, Peter S. [3 ]
Thompson, Ian M., Jr. [8 ]
Wagner, Andrew A. [9 ]
Wei, John T. [10 ]
Lin, Daniel W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Vet Affairs Hosp, Seattle Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[7] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[8] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[9] Beth Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[10] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostate specific antigen; body mass index; biopsy; watchful waiting; RISK; GRADE; PROGRESSION; OUTCOMES; COHORT; SCORE; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.090
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: During active surveillance for localized prostate cancer, the timing of the first surveillance biopsy varies. We analyzed the Canary PASS (Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study) to determine biopsy timing influence on rates of prostate cancer adverse reclassification at the first active surveillance biopsy. Materials and Methods: Of 1,085 participants in PASS, 421 had fewer than 34% of cores involved with cancer and Gleason sum 6 or less, and thereafter underwent on-study active surveillance biopsy. Reclassification was defined as an increase in Gleason sum and/or 34% or more of cores with prostate cancer. First active surveillance biopsy reclassification rates were categorized as less than 8, 8 to 13 and greater than 13 months after diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression determined association between reclassification and first biopsy timing. Results: Of 421 men, 89 (21.1%) experienced reclassification at the first active surveillance biopsy. Median time from prostate cancer diagnosis to first active surveillance biopsy was 11 months (IQR 7.8-13.8). Reclassification rates at less than 8, 8 to 13 and greater than 13 months were 24%, 19% and 22% (p = 0.65). On multivariable analysis, compared to men biopsied at less than 8 months the OR of reclassification at 8 to 13 and greater than 13 months were 0.88 (95% CI 0.5,1.6) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.5,1.9), respectively. Prostate specific antigen density 0.15 or greater (referent less than 0.15, OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1, 4.1) and body mass index 35 kg/m(2) or greater (referent less than 25 kg/m(2), OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1,5.7) were associated with increased odds of reclassification. Conclusions: Timing of the first active surveillance biopsy was not associated with increased adverse reclassification but prostate specific antigen density and body mass index were. In low risk patients on active surveillance, it may be reasonable to perform the first active surveillance biopsy at a later time, reducing the overall cost and morbidity of active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:1026 / 1033
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting Biopsy Outcomes During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators in Five Large Active Surveillance Cohorts
    Drost, Frank Jan H.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Trock, Bruce
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Carroll, Peter
    Filson, Christopher
    Kim, Jeri
    Logothetis, Christopher
    Morgan, Todd
    Klotz, Laurence
    Pickles, Tom
    Hyndman, Eric
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Bangma, Chris
    Roobol, Monique
    Villers, Arnauld
    Rannikko, Antti
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Perry, Antoinette
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Rubio-Briones, Jose
    Bjartell, Anders
    Hefermehl, Lukas
    Shiong, Lee Lui
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Ha Chung, Byung
    van der Kwast, Theo
    van der Linden, Wim
    Hulsen, Tim
    de Jonge, Cees
    Kattan, Mike
    Ji Xinge
    Muir, Kenneth
    Lophatananon, Artitaya
    Fahey, Michael
    Steyerberg, Ewout
    Zhang, Liying
    Beckmann, Kerri
    Denton, Brian
    Hayen, Andrew
    Boutros, Paul
    Guo, Wei
    Benfante, Nicole
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (05) : 693 - 702
  • [32] Identifying Men Who Can Remain on Active Surveillance Despite Biopsy Reclassification to Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer
    Baraban, Ezra
    Erak, Eric
    Fatima, Aisha
    Akbari, Amir
    Zhao, Jianping
    Fletcher, Sean A.
    Bhanji, Yasin
    de la Calle, Claire M.
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Landis, Patricia
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 210 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [33] Active Surveillance for Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer in African Caribbean Men: Results of a Prospective Study
    Meunier, Matthias
    Eyraud, Remi
    Senechal, Cedric
    Gourtaud, Gilles
    Roux, Virginie
    Lanchon, Cecilia
    Brureau, Laurent
    Blanchet, Pascal
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (05) : 1229 - 1235
  • [34] Active surveillance for prostate cancer in a veteran population
    Lee, Eugene K.
    Baack, Janet
    Penn, Heidi
    Bromfield, Cecil T.
    Duchene, David A.
    Thrasher, J. Brantley
    Holzbeierlein, Jeffrey M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) : 5429 - 5435
  • [35] Role of MRI in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    Chappidi, Meera R.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2025, 46 (01) : 31 - 44
  • [36] Active surveillance and surgery in localized prostate cancer
    Kwon, O.
    Hong, S. K.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2014, 66 (03) : 175 - 187
  • [37] Imaging in Diagnosis and Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Li, Thomas
    Nalavenkata, Sunny
    Fainberg, Jonathan
    JAMA SURGERY, 2025, 160 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [38] The Current Status of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Pan, David L. W.
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Eldefrawy, Ahmed
    Manoharan, Murugesan
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2012, 124 (03) : 50 - 58
  • [39] Appropriateness Criteria for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    Cher, Michael L.
    Dhir, Apoorv
    Auffenberg, Gregory B.
    Linsell, Susan
    Gao, Yuqing
    Rosenberg, Bradley
    Jafri, S. Mohammad
    Klotz, Laurence
    Miller, David C.
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Bernstein, Steven J.
    Montie, James E.
    Lane, Brian R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [40] Prostate Cancer and the Increasing Role of Active Surveillance
    Alonzo, David Gabriel
    Mure, Amanda Lynne
    Soloway, Mark S.
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2013, 125 (05) : 109 - 116