Kirkpatrick Model: Its Limitations as Used in Higher Education Evaluation

被引:63
作者
Cahapay, Michael B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mindanao State Univ, Coll Educ, Gen Santos City, Philippines
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION | 2021年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
Kirkpatrick model; Program evaluation; Higher education; Limitation; CRITIQUE;
D O I
10.21449/ijate.856143
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
One of the widely known evaluation models adapted to education is the Kirkpatrick model. However, this model has limitations when used by evaluators especially in the complex environment of higher education. Addressing the scarcity of a collective effort on discussing these limitations, this review paper aims to present a descriptive analysis of the limitations of the Kirkpatrick evaluation model in the higher education field. Three themes of limitations were found out: propensity towards the use of the lower levels of the model; rigidity wick leaves out other essential aspects of the evaluand; and paucity of evidence on the causal chains among the levels. It is suggested that, when employing the Kirkpatrick model in higher education, evaluators should address these limitations by considering more appropriate methods, integrating contextual inputs in the evaluation framework, and establishing causal relationships among the levels. These suggestions to address the limitations of the model are discussed at the end of the study.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 144
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Research methodology workshops evaluation using the Kirkpatrick's model: Translating theory into practice
    Abdulghani, Hamza Mohammad
    Shaik, Shaffi Ahamed
    Khamis, Nehal
    Al-Drees, Abdulmajeed Abdulrahman
    Irshad, Mohammad
    Khalil, Mahmoud Salah
    Alhaqwi, Ali Ibrahim
    Isnani, Arthur
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2014, 36 : S24 - S29
  • [2] Abernathy DJ, 1999, TRAINING DEV, V53, P18
  • [3] KIRKPATRICK LEVELS OF TRAINING CRITERIA - 30 YEARS LATER
    ALLIGER, GM
    JANAK, EA
    [J]. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 42 (02) : 331 - 342
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, PERSPECTIVE HLTH INF
  • [5] Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features
    Arthur, W
    Bennett, W
    Edens, PS
    Bell, ST
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (02) : 234 - 245
  • [6] Arthur W., 2003, EDUC PSYCHOL-UK, V23, P275
  • [7] Aryadoust V, 2017, PEDAGOGIES, V12, P151, DOI 10.1080/1554480X.2016.1242426
  • [8] Baskin C., 2001, Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, P37
  • [9] A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence
    Bates, R
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2004, 27 (03) : 341 - 347
  • [10] Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
    Bowen, Glenn A.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (02) : 27 - +