Risk factors for symptomatic stone recurrence after transpapillary laser lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones using a laser with a stone recognition system

被引:21
作者
Jakobs, Ralf
Hartmann, Dirk
Kudis, Valerie
Eickhoff, Axel
Schilling, Dieter
Weickert, Uwe
Siegler, Karl E.
Riemann, Juergen F.
机构
[1] Acad Teaching Hosp, Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen, Dept Med C Gastroenterol, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[2] Acad Teaching Hosp, Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen, Dept Biostat, Ludwigshafen, Germany
关键词
laser; lithotripsy; bile duct; stone; recurrence;
D O I
10.1097/00042737-200605000-00003
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL) is successfully used for the treatment of difficult bile duct stones. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term risk for a symptomatic bile duct stone recurrence after LISL and to detect risk factors predicting recurrence. Methods. Between 1993 and 2001, 80 patients with difficult bile duct stones were successfully treated by intracorporeal LISL through the papilla of Vater. Seventy-one of these patients [median age, 65.8 years; 51 women (71.8%)] were followed for a median (range) period of 58 (1-114) months. Results. Eleven patients (15.5%) had a symptomatic stone recurrence. The median (range) period between laser lithotripsy and recurrence was 40 (5-85) months. The presence of a bile duct stenosis (P=0.032) and a body-mass index below 25 (P=0.025) were significantly associated with an increased risk for stone recurrence. A gallbladder in situ, the presence of gallbladder stones, dilation of the bile duct, or a peripapillary diverticulum was not associated with stone recurrence. Conclusions. The presence of a bile duct stenosis is significantly related to bile duct stone recurrence after treatment with LISL. The impact of the body mass index on stone recurrence is interesting. The gallbladder status did not predict stone recurrence in our study.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 473
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Management of retained bile duct stones: A prospective open trial comparing extracorporeal and intracorporeal lithotripsy [J].
Adamek, HE ;
Maier, M ;
Jakobs, R ;
Wessbecher, FR ;
Neuhauser, T ;
Riemann, JF .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (01) :40-47
[2]   Impact of gallbladder status on the outcome in patients with retained bile duct stones treated with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [J].
Adamek, HE ;
Kudis, V ;
Jakobs, R ;
Buttmann, A ;
Adamek, MU ;
Riemann, JF .
ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (08) :624-627
[3]   Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy [J].
Ando, T ;
Tsuyuguchi, T ;
Okugawa, T ;
Saito, M ;
Ishihara, T ;
Yamaguchi, T ;
Saisho, H .
GUT, 2003, 52 (01) :116-121
[4]  
ANGELICO M, 1988, HEPATOLOGY, V8, P907
[5]   TREATMENT OF DIFFICULT BILE-DUCT STONES USING MECHANICAL, ELECTROHYDRAULIC AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
BINMOELLER, KF ;
BRUCKNER, M ;
THONKE, F ;
SOEHENDRA, N .
ENDOSCOPY, 1993, 25 (03) :201-206
[6]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY OF PAPILLA OF VATER AND EXTRACTION OF STONES FROM CHOLEDOCHAL DUCT [J].
CLASSEN, M ;
DEMLING, L .
DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1974, 99 (11) :496-497
[7]   ENDOSCOPIC LASER LITHOTRIPSY OF LARGE BILE-DUCT STONES [J].
COTTON, PB ;
KOZAREK, RA ;
SCHAPIRO, RH ;
NISHIOKA, NS ;
KELSEY, PB ;
BALL, TJ ;
PUTNAM, WS ;
BARKUN, A ;
WEINERTH, J .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 99 (04) :1128-1133
[8]   FOLLOW-UP 6 TO 11 YEARS AFTER DUODENOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR STONES IN PATIENTS WITH PRIOR CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
HAWES, RH ;
COTTON, PB ;
VALLON, AG .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 98 (04) :1008-1012
[9]  
Hintze RE, 1996, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V43, P473
[10]  
Hoshi H, 1996, Diagn Ther Endosc, V3, P81, DOI 10.1155/DTE.3.81