A systematic literature review on state-of-the-art deep learning methods for process prediction

被引:104
作者
Neu, Dominic A. [1 ,2 ]
Lahann, Johannes [1 ,2 ]
Fettke, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] German Res Ctr Artificial Intelligence DFKI, Inst Informat Syst, Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Saarland Univ, Inst Informat Syst, Saarbrucken, Germany
关键词
Process prediction; Predictive process monitoring; Systematic literature review; Deep learning;
D O I
10.1007/s10462-021-09960-8
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Process mining enables the reconstruction and evaluation of business processes based on digital traces in IT systems. An increasingly important technique in this context is process prediction. Given a sequence of events of an ongoing trace, process prediction allows forecasting upcoming events or performance measurements. In recent years, multiple process prediction approaches have been proposed, applying different data processing schemes and prediction algorithms. This study focuses on deep learning algorithms since they seem to outperform their machine learning alternatives consistently. Whilst having a common learning algorithm, they use different data preprocessing techniques, implement a variety of network topologies and focus on various goals such as outcome prediction, time prediction or control-flow prediction. Additionally, the set of log-data, evaluation metrics and baselines used by the authors diverge, making the results hard to compare. This paper attempts to synthesise the advantages and disadvantages of the procedural decisions in these approaches by conducting a systematic literature review.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 827
页数:27
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Abadi M., 2015, TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems
[2]  
Al-Jebrni A, 2018, PR IEEE I C PROGR IN, P332, DOI 10.1109/PIC.2018.8706282
[3]   Automated Discovery of Process Models from Event Logs: Review and Benchmark [J].
Augusto, Adriano ;
Conforti, Raffaele ;
Dumas, Marlon ;
La Rosa, Marcello ;
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria ;
Marrella, Andrea ;
Mecella, Massimo ;
Soo, Allar .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2019, 31 (04) :686-705
[4]   Business Process Workflow Mining Using Machine Learning Techniques for the Rail Transport Industry [J].
Bandis, Eleftherios ;
Petridis, Miltos ;
Kapetanakis, Stelios .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE XXXV (AI 2018), 2018, 11311 :446-451
[5]  
Camargo M, 2019, LECT NOTES COMPUTER, V11675, P286, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_19, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_19]
[6]   Predictive Process Monitoring Methods: Which One Suits Me Best? [J].
Di Francescomarino, Chiara ;
Ghidini, Chiara ;
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria ;
Milani, Fredrik .
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT (BPM 2018), 2018, 11080 :462-479
[7]   An Eye into the Future: Leveraging A-priori Knowledge in Predictive Business Process Monitoring [J].
Di Francescomarino, Chiara ;
Ghidini, Chiara ;
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria ;
Petrucci, Giulio ;
Yeshchenko, Anton .
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT, BPM 2017, 2017, 10445 :252-268
[8]   Activity Prediction of Business Process Instances with Inception CNN Models [J].
Di Mauro, Nicola ;
Appice, Annalisa ;
Basile, Teresa M. A. .
ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, AI*IA 2019, 2019, 11946 :348-361
[9]   Predictive Monitoring of Business Processes: A Survey [J].
Eduardo Marquez-Chamorro, Alfonso ;
Resinas, Manuel ;
Ruiz-Cortes, Antonio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING, 2018, 11 (06) :962-977
[10]   A Deep Learning Approach for Predicting Process Behaviour at Runtime [J].
Evermann, Joerg ;
Rehse, Jana-Rebecca ;
Fettke, Peter .
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS, BPM 2016, 2017, 281 :327-338