Using civil society as an authoritarian legitimation strategy: Algeria and Mozambique in comparative perspective

被引:59
作者
Lorch, Jasmin [1 ]
Bunk, Bettina [1 ]
机构
[1] German Inst Global & Area Studies GIGA, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
civil society; authoritarian regimes; authoritarian legitimation; authoritarian resilience; Algeria; Mozambique; COMPETITIVE AUTHORITARIANISM; STATE POWER; REGIMES; CONTESTATION; COOPERATION; DURABILITY; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/13510347.2016.1256285
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Recent research on civil society in authoritarian regimes shows that civil society can contribute to legitimating authoritarian rule. This finding has not, however, been connected with the nascent literature on authoritarian regime legitimation. This article seeks to bridge this gap by synthesizing the relevant theoretical literature and presenting an in-depth comparative analysis of Algeria and Mozambique. We argue that in both cases the ruling authoritarian regime has used civil society as a legitimation tool. The article identifies five patterns according to which authoritarian regimes can use civil society for legitimation purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 1005
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Abrahamsson Hans., 1995, MOZAMBIQUE TROUBLED
[2]  
Bailer Stefanie, 2007, COMP PERSPECTIVES, V2
[3]   Autocratic Opening to Democracy: why legitimacy matters [J].
Burnell, P .
THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2006, 27 (04) :545-562
[4]  
Bustos R., 2003, MEDITERR POLIT, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/13629390308010001
[5]   Can oil-reliant countries democratize? An assessment of the role of civil society in Algeria [J].
Butcher, Charity .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2014, 21 (04) :722-742
[6]  
Carothers ThomasSaskia Brechenmacher., 2014, CLOSING SPACE DEMOCR
[7]  
Cavatorta Francesco., 2013, Civil Society Activism under Authoritarian Rule: A Comparative Perspective
[8]  
Chabal P., 1999, AFRICA WORKS DISORDE
[9]   SOUTHEAST ASIA: SOURCES OF REGIME SUPPORT [J].
Chang, Alex ;
Chu, Yun-han ;
Welsh, Bridget .
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2013, 24 (02) :150-164
[10]  
Cohen J.L., 1995, CIVIL SOC POLITICAL, V3