Barriers to investing in cycling: Stakeholder views from England

被引:50
作者
Aldred, Rachel [1 ]
Watson, Tom [2 ]
Lovelace, Robin [3 ]
Woodcock, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Westminster Univ, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Dept Planning & Transport, 35 Marylebone Rd, London NW1 5LS, England
[2] Westminster Univ, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Policy Studies Inst, 35 Marylebone Rd, London NW1 5LS, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, 34-40 Univ Rd, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, MRC Epidemiol Unit, UKCRC Ctr Diet & Act Res CEDAR,Inst Metab Sci, Box 285,Cambridge Biomed Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
TRANSPORT; WALKING; INFRASTRUCTURE; PERSPECTIVES; NETHERLANDS; LESSONS; CITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background Planners and politicians in many countries seek to increase the proportion of trips made by cycling. However, this is often challenging. In England, a national target to double cycling by 2025 is likely to be missed: between 2001 and 2011 the proportion of commutes made by cycling barely grew. One important contributory factor is continued low investment in cycling infrastructure, by comparison to European leaders. Methods: This paper examines barriers to cycling investment, considering that these need to be better understood to understand failures to increase cycling level. It is based on qualitative data from an online survey of over 400 stakeholders, alongside seven in-depth interviews. Results: Many respondents reported that change continues to be blocked by chronic barriers including a lack of funding and leadership. Participants provided insights into how challenges develop along the life of a scheme. In authorities with little consideration given to cycling provision, media and public opposition were not reported as a major issue. However, where planning and implementation have begun, this can change quickly; although examples were given of schemes successfully proceeding, despite this. The research points to a growing gap between authorities that have overcome key challenges, and those that have not.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 159
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Cycling provision separated from motor traffic: a systematic review exploring whether stated preferences vary by gender and age [J].
Aldred, Rachel ;
Elliott, Bridget ;
Woodcock, James ;
Goodman, Anna .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2017, 37 (01) :29-55
[2]   Who are Londoners on Bikes and what do they want? Negotiating identity and issue definition in a 'pop-up' cycle campaign [J].
Aldred, Rachel .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 30 :194-201
[3]   Incompetent or Too Competent? Negotiating Everyday Cycling Identities in a Motor Dominated Society [J].
Aldred, Rachel .
MOBILITIES, 2013, 8 (02) :252-271
[4]   Governing transport from welfare state to hollow state: The case of cycling in the UK [J].
Aldred, Rachel .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2012, 23 :95-102
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The British Cycling Economy: Gross Cycling Product Report
[6]   Symbolic Meta-Policy: (Not) Tackling Climate Change in the Transport Sector [J].
Bache, Ian ;
Reardon, Louise ;
Bartle, Ian ;
Flinders, Matthew ;
Marsden, Greg .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2015, 63 (04) :830-851
[7]  
Banister D., 2000, ENCOURAGING TRANSPOR
[8]  
Banister D., 2005, Barriers to Sustainable Transport: Institutions, Regulations and Sustainability
[9]  
British Cycling, 2016, CYCL WALK STRAT WONT
[10]   Reducing car dependence in the heart of Europe: lessons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland [J].
Buehler, Ralph ;
Pucher, John ;
Gerike, Regine ;
Gotschi, Thomas .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2017, 37 (01) :4-28