Polarization politics and hopes for a green agenda in the United States

被引:16
作者
Clark, April [1 ]
Justwan, Florian [2 ]
Carlisle, Juliet E. [3 ]
Clark, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Northern Illinois Univ, Polit Sci, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
[2] Univ Idaho, Polit & Philosophy, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Polit Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Opinion change; environmentalism; polarization; period; generational; trends; PERIOD-COHORT ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTION SURVEYS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PUBLIC-OPINION; SUPPORT; TRENDS; ATTITUDES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/09644016.2019.1654238
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the past, support for environmental protection in the United States was relatively nonpartisan. That situation began to change in the late 1970s with partisanship playing an increasing role in attitudes and behavior regarding the environment. Despite the growing importance of environmental issues, Republicans, especially conservative Republicans, express greater skepticism about climate change, global warming, and environmentalism in general. We take advantage of a new method of estimation to gauge the degree of partisan and ideological variability in environmental concern across birth cohorts and time, while also testing the role of compositional and contextual causes of this variability. This contributes to our understanding of large-scale changes in environmental attitudes, and the degree to which partisan identification and political ideology is to blame for lack of environmental concern and efforts to promote a green agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 745
页数:27
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]  
Hays SamuelP., 1987, Beauty, Health and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955-1985
[32]  
Inglehart R., 2003, RISING TIDE GENDER E
[33]   The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism [J].
Jacques, Peter J. ;
Dunlap, Riley E. ;
Freeman, Mark .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2008, 17 (03) :349-385
[34]   PARTISAN ORIENTATIONS OVER THE LONG HAUL - RESULTS FROM THE 3-WAVE POLITICAL-SOCIALIZATION PANEL STUDY [J].
JENNINGS, MK ;
MARKUS, GB .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1984, 78 (04) :1000-1018
[35]   Political Polarization and Long-Term Change in Public Support for Environmental Spending [J].
Johnson, Erik W. ;
Schwadel, Philip .
SOCIAL FORCES, 2019, 98 (02) :913-939
[36]   It Is Not a Cohort Thing: Interrogating the Relationship Between Age, Cohort, and Support for the Environment [J].
Johnson, Erik W. ;
Schwadel, Philip .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2019, 51 (07) :879-901
[37]  
Kanagy C. L., 1994, SOCIAL SCI Q, V74, P674
[38]   Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States [J].
Kellstedt, Paul M. ;
Zahran, Sammy ;
Vedlitz, Arnold .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2008, 28 (01) :113-126
[39]  
Kingdon JW., 1995, AGENDAS ALTERNATIVES, P254
[40]   Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization [J].
Levendusky, Matthew S. .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 32 (01) :111-131