Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review

被引：95

作者：

Abrahamsson, Ingemar ^{[1
]}

Berglundh, Tord ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Periodontol, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden

来源：

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH | 2009年 / 20卷

关键词：

ankylos; bone level; bone loss; dental implants; implant design; implant geometry; implant surface; machined; micro-thread; OsseoSpeed; Osseotite; platform-switch; SLA; TiOblast; TiUnite and turned; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES; BRANEMARK SYSTEM IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; ASTRA TECH; RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; ITI IMPLANTS; 3I IMPLANTS;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01783.x

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

Objective The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effect of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level (MBL) alterations. Material and methods A MEDLINE search (PubMed) was performed to identify clinical, prospective and controlled studies using a sufficient sample size (> 10 subjects) and with a follow-up time of >= 3 years. Results Ten publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two studies evaluated the influence of implant surface characteristics and two studies reported on the effect of implant design on MBL changes. Six publications analyzed the combined effect of different implant surfaces and designs on MBL alterations. As revealed from available studies, there is no evidence that modified surfaces are superior to non-modified implant surfaces in marginal bone preservation. One study reported on significantly improved MBL preservation for implants with a conical and micro-threaded marginal collar than implants with a cylindrical and non-threaded marginal portion after 3 years in function. No implant system was found to be superior in marginal bone preservation. To cite this article:Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a systematic review.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20 (Suppl. 4), 2009; 207-215.doi: 10.11117/j.1600-0501.2009.01783.x.

引用

页码：207 / 215

页数：9

共 42 条

[11] Immediate/early function of Branemark System® TiUnite™ implants in fresh extraction sockets in maxillae and posterior mandibles:: An 18-month prospective clinical study [J].

Bogaerde, LV ;

Rangert, B ;

Wendelhag, I .

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, 7 :S121-S130

[12]

Cappiello M, 2008, INT J PERIODONT REST, V28, P347

[13]

Davarpanah M, 2002, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V17, P820

[14]

Davarpanah M, 2001, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V16, P52

[15]

Engquist B, 2002, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V13, P30

[16]

Finne K, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P226

[17] Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite™ implants after one-stage surgery:: A 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients [J].

Friberg, Bertil ;

Jemt, Torsten .

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (01) :47-54

[18] Immediate loading of branemark system Implants®:: A comparison between TiUnite™ and turned implants placed in the anterior mandible [J].

Froberg, Kjell-Krister ;

Lindh, Christina ;

Ericsson, Ingvar .

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (04) :187-197

[19]

Gatti Claudio, 2002, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V4, P190, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00171.x

[20]

Gotfredsen K, 2001, J Prosthodont, V10, P2, DOI 10.1053/jpro.2001.23470

← 1 2 3 4 5 →