Neoadjuvant treatment for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: where do we stand and where are we going?

被引:43
作者
Moschetta, Michele [1 ]
Boussios, Stergios [2 ,3 ]
Rassy, Elie [4 ,5 ]
Samartzis, Eleftherios P. [6 ]
Funingana, Gabriel [7 ]
Uccello, Mario [8 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Cambridge, England
[2] Medway NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Med Oncol, Gillingham, Kent, England
[3] AELIA Org, 9th Km Thessaloniki Thermi, Thessaloniki, Greece
[4] Gustave Roussy Inst, Dept Canc Med, Villejuif, France
[5] St Joseph Univ, Hotel Dieu France Univ Hosp, Dept Hematol Oncol, Fac Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[6] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Gynecol, Frauenklinikstr 10, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[7] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge, England
[8] Northampton Gen Hosp NHS Trust, Northampton, England
关键词
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT); epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC); patient selection; imaging; biomarkers; PRIMARY SURGERY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; DEBULKING SURGERY; EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS; T-CELLS; CHEMOTHERAPY; RECURRENCE; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; TOMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.21037/atm-20-1683
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Newly diagnosed high grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients are treated with radical surgery followed by adjuvant platinum and taxane combination chemotherapy. In EOC patients where upfront surgery is contraindicated for medical reasons (e.g., comorbidities or poor performance status), or where complete cytoreduction cannot be achieved, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) prior to interval debulking surgery (IDS), and adjuvant chemotherapy is an alternative therapeutic option. There is currently a lack of consensus about who are the best candidates to receive NACT, and some authors have even suggested that this approach could be harmful in a subset of patients via promotion of early chemoresistance. Standard and novel imaging techniques together with a better molecular characterization of the disease have the potential to improve selection of patients, but ultimately well designed randomised clinical trials are needed to guide treatment decisions in this setting. The advent of new and effective treatment options (antiangiogenics and PARP inhibitors), now approved for use in the first line and relapse settings has opened the way to clinical trials aiming to investigate these agents as substitute or in addition to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting in molecularly selected EOC patients. Here, we will review the evidence supporting the use of NACT in newly diagnosed EOCs, data highlighting the importance of its use in selected patients, new imaging methodologies and biomarkers that can guide patient selection.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [41] Timing and Pattern of Recurrence in Ovarian Cancer Patients with High Tumor Dissemination Treated with Primary Debulking Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Petrillo, M.
    Ferrandina, G.
    Fagotti, A.
    Vizzielli, G.
    Margariti, P. A.
    Pedone, Anchora L.
    Nero, C.
    Fanfani, F.
    Scambia, Giovanni
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (12) : 3955 - 3960
  • [42] Prognostic role and predictors of complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary unresectable ovarian cancer
    Petrillo, Marco
    Zannoni, Gian Franco
    Tortorella, Lucia
    Anchora, Luigi Pedone
    Salutari, Vanda
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    Margariti, Pasquale Alessandro
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Fagotti, Anna
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (06) : 632.e1 - 632.e8
  • [43] Ovarian carcinomas: five distinct diseases with different origins, genetic alterations, and clinicopathological features
    Prat, Jaime
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2012, 460 (03) : 237 - 249
  • [44] Platinum resistance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to primary surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    Nitschmann, Caroline C.
    Worley, Micheal J., Jr.
    Bradford, Leslie S.
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    Schorge, John O.
    Campos, Susana M.
    del Carmen, Marcela G.
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 129 (01) : 63 - 68
  • [45] TRUST: Trial of Radical Upfront Surgical Therapy in advanced ovarian cancer (ENGOT ov33/AGO-OVAR OP7)
    Reuss, Alexander
    du Bois, Andreas
    Harter, Philipp
    Fotopoulou, Christina
    Sehouli, Jalid
    Aletti, Giovanni
    Guyon, Frederic
    Greggi, Stefano
    Mosgaard, Berit Jul
    Reinthaller, Alexander
    Hilpert, Felix
    Schade-Brittinger, Carmen
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Mahner, Sven
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (08) : 1327 - 1331
  • [46] New ways of assessing ovarian cancer response: metabolic imaging and beyond
    Rockall, Andrea
    Munari, Alice
    Avril, Norbert
    [J]. CANCER IMAGING, 2012, 12 (02) : 310 - 314
  • [47] Defining response of ovarian carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125
    Rustin, GJS
    Nelstrop, AE
    McClean, P
    Brady, MF
    McGuire, WP
    Hoskins, WJ
    Mitchell, H
    Lambert, HE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (05) : 1545 - 1551
  • [48] Histopathologic assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced-stage ovarian cancer
    Sassen, Stefanie
    Schmalfeldt, Barbara
    Avril, Norbert
    Kuhn, Walther
    Busch, Raymonde
    Hoefler, Heinz
    Fend, Falko
    Naehrig, Joerg
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 38 (06) : 926 - 934
  • [49] Survival Rates for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage III Ovarian Carcinoma by Cell Type A Study of 262 Unselected Patients With Uniform Pathologic Review
    Seidman, Jeffrey D.
    Yemelyanova, Anna
    Cosin, Jonathan A.
    Smith, Anthony
    Kurman, Robert J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2012, 22 (03) : 367 - 371
  • [50] 18F-FDG-PET/CT can identify histopathological non-responders to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Vallius, Tuulia
    Peter, Anniina
    Auranen, Annika
    Carpen, Olli
    Kemppainen, Jukka
    Matomaki, Jaakko
    Oksa, Sinikka
    Roering, Pia
    Seppanen, Marko
    Grenman, Seija
    Hynninen, Johanna
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 140 (01) : 29 - 35