A Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition-Based Mahalanobis Distance Method for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

被引:407
作者
Zhang, Yuxiang [1 ]
Du, Bo [2 ]
Zhang, Liangpei [3 ]
Wang, Shugen [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Remote Sensing & Informat Engn, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Sch Comp, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying Mapping & R, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2016年 / 54卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anomaly detection; hyperspectral imagery; low rank; sparse; TARGET DETECTION; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2015.2479299
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Anomaly detection is playing an increasingly important role in hyperspectral image (HSI) processing. The traditional anomaly detection methods mainly extract knowledge from the background and use the difference between the anomalies and the background to distinguish them. Anomaly contamination and the inverse covariance matrix problem are the main difficulties with these methods. The low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition (LRaSMD) technique may have the potential to solve the aforementioned hyperspectral anomaly detection problem since it can extract knowledge from both the background and the anomalies. This paper proposes an LRaSMD-based Mahalanobis distance method for hyperspectral anomaly detection (LSMAD). This approach has the following capabilities: 1) takes full advantage of the LRaSMD technique to set the background apart from the anomalies; 2) explores the low-rank prior knowledge of the background to compute the background statistics; and 3) applies the Mahalanobis distance differences to detect the probable anomalies. Extensive experiments were carried out on four HSIs, and it was found that LSMAD shows a better detection performance than the current state-of-the-art hyperspectral anomaly detection methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1376 / 1389
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P IEEE INT GEOSC REM
[2]   A support vector method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery [J].
Banerjee, Amit ;
Burlina, Philippe ;
Diehl, Chris .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (08) :2282-2291
[3]  
Becker C, 1999, J AM STAT ASSOC, V94, P947
[4]   BACON: blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators [J].
Billor, N ;
Hadi, AS ;
Velleman, PF .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2000, 34 (03) :279-298
[5]   Hyperspectral subspace identification [J].
Bioucas-Dias, Jose M. ;
Nascimento, Jose M. P. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 46 (08) :2435-2445
[6]  
Borengasser M., 2008, Hyperspectral Remote Sensing - Principles and Applications
[7]   Robust Principal Component Analysis? [J].
Candes, Emmanuel J. ;
Li, Xiaodong ;
Ma, Yi ;
Wright, John .
JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 2011, 58 (03)
[8]   Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery [J].
Chang, CI ;
Chiang, SS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 40 (06) :1314-1325
[9]   Target signature-constrained mixed pixel classification for hyperspectral imagery [J].
Chang, CI .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 40 (05) :1065-1081
[10]   Sparse Representation for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery [J].
Chen, Yi ;
Nasrabadi, Nasser M. ;
Tran, Trac D. .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, 5 (03) :629-640