Noise reduction in BOLD-based fMRI using component analysis

被引:216
作者
Thomas, CG [1 ]
Harshman, RA
Menon, RS
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Psychol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Radiol, London, ON, Canada
[4] John P Robarts Res Inst, Lab Functional Magnet Resonance Res, London, ON N6A 5K8, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/nimg.2002.1200
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) were used to decompose the fMRI time series signal and separate the BOLD signal change from the structured and random noise. Rather than using component analysis to identify spatial patterns of activation and noise, the approach we took was to identify PCA or ICA components contributing primarily to the noise. These noise components were identified using an unsupervised algorithm that examines the Fourier decomposition of each component time series. Noise components were then removed before subsequent reconstruction of the time series data. The BOLD contrast sensitivity (CSBOLD), defined as the ability to detect a BOLD signal change in the presence of physiological and scanner noise, was then calculated for all voxels. There was an increase in CSBOLD values of activated voxels after noise reduction as a result of decreased image-to-image variability in the time series of each voxel. A comparison of PCA and ICA revealed significant differences in their treatment of both structured and random noise. ICA proved better for isolation and removal of structured noise, while PCA was superior for isolation and removal of random noise. This provides a framework for using and evaluating component analysis techniques for noise reduction in fMRI. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
引用
收藏
页码:1521 / 1537
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Principal component analysis of the dynamic response measured by fMRI: A generalized linear systems framework
    Andersen, AH
    Gash, DM
    Avison, MJ
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (06) : 795 - 815
  • [2] How well do we understand the neural origins of the fMRI BOLD signal?
    Arthurs, OJ
    Boniface, S
    [J]. TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2002, 25 (01) : 27 - 31
  • [3] Bandettini PA, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V43, P540, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200004)43:4<540::AID-MRM8>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-R
  • [5] Independent component representations for face recognition
    Bartlett, MS
    Lades, HM
    Sejnowski, TJ
    [J]. HUMAN VISION AND ELECTRONIC IMAGING III, 1998, 3299 : 528 - 539
  • [6] AN INFORMATION MAXIMIZATION APPROACH TO BLIND SEPARATION AND BLIND DECONVOLUTION
    BELL, AJ
    SEJNOWSKI, TJ
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1995, 7 (06) : 1129 - 1159
  • [7] Berns G S, 1999, J Neurosci, V19, pRC17
  • [8] Reduction of physiological fluctuations in fMRI using digital filters
    Biswal, B
    DeYoe, EA
    Hyde, JS
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (01) : 107 - 113
  • [9] Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis
    Biswal, BB
    Ulmer, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1999, 23 (02) : 265 - 271
  • [10] IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION FOR ECHO PLANAR IMAGING WITH NONEQUIDISTANT KAPPA-SPACE SAMPLING
    BRUDER, H
    FISCHER, H
    REINFELDER, HE
    SCHMITT, F
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 23 (02) : 311 - 323