Exploring the Relationship between Complexity and Risk in Megaconstruction Projects

被引:28
作者
Erol, Huseyin [1 ,2 ]
Dikmen, Irem [1 ]
Atasoy, Guzide [1 ]
Birgonul, M. Talat [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Dumlupinar Bulvari 1, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Beytepe Campus, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Complexity; Risk; Uncertainty; Megaprojects; Mixed methods; Construction management; MANAGEMENT; MEGAPROJECTS; MODEL; COST; STRATEGIES; OVERRUNS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001946
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Although complexity and risk are inherent characteristics of megaconstruction projects, existing project management approaches fail to incorporate complexity-based thinking into risk management. Complexity is usually considered as the source of risk events, along with uncertainty. However, prevailing risk management practices are oriented toward only handling the uncertainty. The lack of integration between the complexity and other risk-related concepts leads to unrealistic project risk assessments and the formulation of imperfect management strategies. The aim of this research is to explore the relationship between complexity and risk in detail and propose an integrated risk assessment approach. For this purpose, a mixed-methods research approach was adopted to collect data via semistructured interviews and survey questions. Data obtained from 11 megaconstruction projects carried out by Turkish contractors were analyzed in two ways. Quantitative findings served to verify the relationship between complexity and risk in numerical terms, whereas qualitative findings were utilized to develop a framework that explains the nature of this relationship. The conceptual framework represents the links between complexity and risk in megaconstruction projects, together with uncertainty and management strategies. The existence of causal relations between these concepts may constitute a significant challenge during the risk assessment. Therefore, an integrated risk assessment process (IRAP) was proposed so that megaproject practitioners could develop better risk management plans. The findings of this research were based on megaconstruction projects, but they may also apply to other types of projects. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   A review of artificial intelligence based risk assessment methods for capturing complexity-risk interdependencies Cost overrun in construction projects [J].
Afzal, Farman ;
Shao Yunfei ;
Nazir, Mubasher ;
Bhatti, Saad Mahmood .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2021, 14 (02) :300-328
[2]   Exploratory Study on the Effectiveness of Interface-Management Practices in Dealing with Project Complexity in Large-Scale Engineering and Construction Projects [J].
Ahn, Seungjun ;
Shokri, Samin ;
Lee, SangHyun ;
Haas, Carl T. ;
Haas, Ralph C. G. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 33 (02)
[3]   SYSTEMATIC-RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS [J].
ALBAHAR, JF ;
CRANDALL, KC .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1990, 116 (03) :533-546
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Risk management: Guidelines
[5]  
APM (Association for Project Management), 2010, PROJECT RISK ANAL MA
[6]  
Aven T., 2015, Risk Analysis
[7]   Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation [J].
Aven, Terje .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 253 (01) :1-13
[8]  
Baccarini D., 1996, International Journal of Project Management, V14, P201, DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
[9]   Clarifying the project complexity construct: Past, present and future [J].
Bakhshi, Javad ;
Ireland, Vernon ;
Gorod, Alex .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (07) :1199-1213
[10]   Applying institutional theories to managing megaprojects [J].
Biesenthal, Christopher ;
Clegg, Stewart ;
Mahalingam, Ashwin ;
Sankaran, Shankar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 36 (01) :43-54