Welfare reform in European countries: A microsimulation analysis

被引:122
作者
Immervoll, Herwig [1 ]
Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen
Kreiner, Claus Thustrup
Saez, Emmanuel
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
[2] OECD, Paris, France
[3] CEPR, London, England
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA
[5] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02000.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article compares the effects of increasing traditional welfare to introducing in-work benefits in the 15 (pre-enlargement) countries of the European Union. We use a labour supply model encompassing responses to taxes and transfers along both the intensive and extensive margins, and the EUROMOD microsimulation model to estimate current marginal and participation tax rates. We quantify the equity-efficiency trade-off for a range of elasticity parameters. In most countries, because of large existing welfare programmes with high phase-out rates, increasing traditional welfare is undesirable unless the redistributive tastes of the government are extreme. In contrast, the in-work benefit reform is desirable in a very wide set of cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 44
页数:44
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Aaberge R, 1999, J APPL ECONOM, V14, P403, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199907/08)14:4<403::AID-JAE520>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-4
[3]  
[Anonymous], REV STAT 1965 2001
[4]  
[Anonymous], HDB LABOR EC
[5]  
[Anonymous], BEN WAG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HDB PUBLIC EC
[7]  
BALLARD CL, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P1019
[8]  
BLUNDELL R, 1999, HDB LABOR EC A, V3
[9]  
Blundell Richard., 2000, FISCAL STUDIES, V21, P75, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00581.x
[10]  
BLUNDELL RW, 2002, KEYNS LECT EC 2001