Improving agent-based negotiation efficiency in construction supply chains: A relative entropy method

被引:20
作者
Xue, Xiaolong [1 ]
Shen, Qiping [4 ]
Li, Heng [4 ]
O'Brien, William J. [2 ]
Ren, Zhaomin [3 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Management, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Austin CF37 1DL, TX USA
[3] Univ Glamorgan, Fac Adv Technol, Div Built Environm, Pontypridd, M Glam, Wales
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Kowloon 150001, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Agent-based negotiation; Negotiation efficiency; Relative entropy; Construction supply chain; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; AUTOMATED NEGOTIATION; COORDINATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2009.05.002
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This research presents a relative entropy method for improving agent-based negotiation efficiency (REANE) in a construction supply chain. REANE provides a path forward to help negotiators reach an acceptable solution when other methods fail; the key insight is the use of relative entropy to measure the relative degree of consensus among parties and hence minimize necessary compromises. An illustrative example is presented to show the application of REANE. The REANE method aggregates the preference information of negotiators in CSC twice. First, a compromise group preference order is ascertained using preference information, which is newly provided by negotiators. and compromise preference information (formed previously in the agent-based auto-negotiation process). Second, group preferences are aggregated by employing a relative entropy model, which is established based on entropy theory, while, considering the multiple attributes of negotiation in a construction supply chain. The method of REANE fulfills the necessary requirement of group decision-making, i.e., maximizing the preference consistency of decision-making groups and minimizing the utility gaps between every negotiator's preference and the group's preference. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 982
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1957, Administrative behavior
  • [2] BERGER JO, 1980, STAT DECISION THEORY, P235
  • [3] Block C., 2006, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, P243
  • [4] Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process: Exploring the consensus-relevant information content
    Bryson, N
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1996, 23 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [5] BUSSMANN S, 1993, P CKBS SIG DAKE CTR, P1
  • [6] Intelligent agents for e-marketplace: Negotiation with issue trade-offs by fuzzy inference systems
    Cheng, Chi-Bin
    Chan, Chu-Chai Henry
    Lin, Kun-Cheng
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2006, 42 (02) : 626 - 638
  • [7] A study of styles and outcomes in construction dispute negotiation
    Cheung, Sai On
    Yiu, Tak Wing Yiu
    Yeung, Sau Fung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 132 (08) : 805 - 814
  • [8] Construction negotiation online
    Cheung, SO
    Yiu, KTW
    Suen, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2004, 130 (06): : 844 - 852
  • [9] Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations
    Chiclana, F
    Herrera, F
    Herrera-Viedma, E
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 97 (01) : 33 - 48
  • [10] Chiclana F., 1996, J FUZZY MATH, V4, P801