Quantitative MR in Multi-center Clinical Trials

被引:14
|
作者
Ashton, Edward [1 ]
机构
[1] VirtualScopics Inc, Rochester, NY 14625 USA
关键词
clinical trials; protocol design; protocol harmonization; MRI; REMITTING MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MRI; PHASE-I; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE; SOLID TUMORS; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; RADIOLOGIC CHANGES; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN-TUMORS;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.22022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
MRI has a wide variety of applications in the clinical trials process. MR has shown particular utility in the early phases of clinical development, when trial sponsors are interested in demonstrating proof of concept and must make decisions about allocation of resources to a particular compound based on the results from a small number of experimental subjects. This utility is largely due to the many different imaging endpoints that can be measured using MR, ranging from structural (tumor burden, hippocampal volume) to functional (blood flow, vascular permeability) to molecular (hepatic fat fraction, glycosaminoglycan content). The unique flexibility of these systems has proven to be both a blessing and a curse to those attempting to deploy MR in multi-center clinical trials, however, as differences among scanner manufacturers and models in pulse sequence implementation, hardware capabilities, and even terminology make it increasingly difficult to ensure that results obtained at one center are comparable to those at another. These problems are compounded by the differences between the procedures used in clinical trials and those used in routine clinical practice, which make trial-specific training for site technologists and radiologists a necessity in many cases. This article will briefly review the benefits of including quantitative MR imaging in clinical trials, then explore in detail the challenges presented by the need to develop and deploy a detailed MR protocol that is both effective and implementable across many different MR systems and software versions.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 288
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A digital imaging network to facilitate a multi-center clinical trial for adrenoleukodystrophy
    Ingeholm, ML
    Levine, BA
    Fatemi, A
    Jimenez-Sanchez, G
    Moser, HW
    CARS 2002: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 497 - 502
  • [12] Texture classification of MR images of the brain in ALS using M-CoHOG: A multi-center study
    Elahi, G. M. Mashrur E.
    Kalra, Sanjay
    Zinman, Lorne
    Genge, Angela
    Korngut, Lawrence
    Yang, Yee-Hong
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2020, 79
  • [13] Practice effects in a longitudinal, multi-center Alzheimer's disease prevention clinical trial
    Abner, Erin L.
    Dennis, Brandon C.
    Mathews, Melissa J.
    Mendiondo, Marta S.
    Caban-Holt, Allison
    Kryscio, Richard J.
    Schmitt, Frederick A.
    Crowley, John J.
    TRIALS, 2012, 13
  • [14] Segmentation of age-related white matter changes in a clinical multi-center study
    Dyrby, Tim B.
    Rostrup, Egill
    Baare, William F. C.
    van Straaten, Elisabeth C. W.
    Barkhof, Frederik
    Vrenken, Hugo
    Ropele, Stefan
    Schmidt, Reinhold
    Erkinjuntti, Timo
    Wahlund, Lars-Olof
    Pantoni, Leonardo
    Inzitari, Domenico
    Paulson, Olaf B.
    Hansen, Lars Kai
    Waldemar, Gunhild
    NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 41 (02) : 335 - 345
  • [15] Natural Language Processing for Adjudication of Heart Failure Hospitalizations in a Multi-Center Clinical Trial
    Cunningham, Jonathan
    Singh, Pulkit
    Reeder, Christopher
    Claggett, Brian
    Castellote, Pablo-Miki Marti
    Lau, Emily
    Khurshid, Shaan
    Batra, Puneet
    Lubitz, Steven
    Maddah, Mahnaz
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [16] Practice effects in a longitudinal, multi-center Alzheimer’s disease prevention clinical trial
    Erin L Abner
    Brandon C Dennis
    Melissa J Mathews
    Marta S Mendiondo
    Allison Caban-Holt
    Richard J Kryscio
    Frederick A Schmitt
    John J Crowley
    Trials, 13
  • [17] Multi-center MRI volume and linearity behavior
    Barbu-McInnis, M.
    Molinelli, L.
    Durkin, E.
    Tamez-Pena, J.
    Totterman, S.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2007: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2007, 6515
  • [18] Bayesian methods to determine performance differences and to quantify variability among centers in multi-center trials: the IHAST trial
    Bayman, Emine O.
    Chaloner, Kathryn M.
    Hindman, Bradley J.
    Todd, Michael M.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [19] Assessing the performance of methods for central statistical monitoring of a binary or continuous outcome in multi-center trials: A simulation study
    Ge, Li
    Wang, Zhongkai
    Liu, Charles C.
    Childress, Spencer
    Wildfire, Jeremy
    Wu, George
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 143
  • [20] Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials
    Kurland, Brenda F.
    Gerstner, Elizabeth R.
    Mountz, James M.
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    Ryan, Christopher W.
    Graham, Michael M.
    Buatti, John M.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Eikman, Edward A.
    Kumar, Virendra
    Forster, Kenneth M.
    Wahl, Richard L.
    Lieberman, Frank S.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 30 (09) : 1301 - 1312