The role of mutual funds in the sustainable energy sector

被引:30
作者
Marti-Ballester, Carmen-Pilar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Business Dept, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
black energy funds; conventional funds; performance evaluation; renewable energy funds; renewable energy screening; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; GREEN; MARKET; STRATEGIES; INNOVATION; COMPANIES; INVESTORS; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2305
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The integration of renewable energy criteria in mutual fund investment decisions could channel private resources into the funding of environmentally related projects implemented by firms contributing to sustainable development. This paper examines the performance of European renewable energy funds that invest globally by comparing their risk-adjusted returns with those achieved by black energy and conventional mutual funds. It uses Carhart's model on a sample of 81 renewable energy funds, 125 black energy funds, and 4,337 conventional mutual funds. The results indicate that 32.1% of renewable mutual funds-most of which adopt energy producers, renewable energy technology, and energy efficiency-focused criteria-perform significantly better than the S&P Clean Energy market benchmark, this percentage being affected by the different states of the economy. However, none of them are able to beat the fossil fuel energy (S&P Global 1200 Energy Index) or conventional market benchmarks (S&P Global 1200 Index). Furthermore, 37.04% of renewable energy funds significantly underperform the S&P Global 1200 benchmark. Therefore, the investment in renewable energy funds has a financial cost for investors in relation to conventional fund investors.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1120
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Environmental Strategies and Green Product Development: an Overview on Sustainability-Driven Companies [J].
Albino, Vito ;
Balice, Azzurra ;
Dangelico, Rosa Maria .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 18 (02) :83-96
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, US BUS CYCL EXP CONT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, APPL FINANCIAL EC, DOI DOI 10.1080/758529174
[4]   Environmental Innovations and Strategies for the Development of New Production Technologies: Empirical Evidence from Europe [J].
Boente, Werner ;
Dienes, Christian .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 22 (08) :501-516
[5]   Mutual fund attributes and investor Behavior [J].
Bollen, Nicolas P. B. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2007, 42 (03) :683-708
[6]   On persistence in mutual fund performance [J].
Carhart, MM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (01) :57-82
[7]   Assessing SRI Fund Performance Research: Best Practices in Empirical Analysis [J].
Chegut, Andrea ;
Schenk, Hans ;
Scholtens, Bert .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 19 (02) :77-94
[8]   The urge to act: A comparison of active and passive socially responsible investment funds in the United States [J].
Chen, Xing ;
Scholtens, Bert .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (06) :1154-1173
[9]   Green and Good? The Investment Performance of US Environmental Mutual Funds [J].
Climent, Francisco ;
Soriano, Pilar .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 103 (02) :275-287
[10]   A natural resource-based view of climate change: Innovation challenges in the automobile industry [J].
Cristina De Stefano, M. ;
Montes-Sancho, Maria J. ;
Busch, Timo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 139 :1436-1448