Experimental and numerical study on the thermal performance of ground source heat pump with a set of designed buried pipes

被引:60
作者
Kong, Xiang-Ri [1 ]
Deng, Yelin [2 ]
Li, Linyan [3 ]
Gong, Wei-Shen [1 ]
Cao, Shi-Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sch Urban Rail Transportat, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Mech Engn, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Ground heat exchanger; Thermal performance; U-tubes; CFD; Turbulent heat diffusion; Pressure loss coefficient; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; U-TUBE; EXCHANGERS; SYSTEMS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.176
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The configuration of pipes is one of the most important factors for the thermal behavior of the Ground Source Heat Pump system (GSHPs). However, few studies have considered the influences of pipe shape in the perspective of turbulent diffusion and pressure loss effects. This paper investigates thermal performance of ground heat exchanger (GHE) with a set of designed U-tubes (i.e., either smooth or with different petals) by using experimental measurements and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Thermal performance is based on temperature difference between inlet and outlet of U-tubes as well as the impact on the surrounding soil. First, an experiment (U-tubes buried with a depth of 100 m) was conducted to validate the CFD k-s RNG model for a smooth U-tube, which agrees well with experiments with suitable boundary conditions and appropriate parameters. Next, CFD simulation tool was mainly employed for other evaluations. Different inlet velocities of U-tubes were considered, and we found the heat transfer per unit borehole depth QL increases with the increase of inlet velocities, e.g., the QL of smooth U-tube was 35 W/m at inlet velocity of 0.2 m/s, and increased by 43% when the velocity was increased to 1.2 m/s. Although U-tubes with different petals would increase the turbulent heat diffusion effects, the flow resistance is also increased due to the increase of pressure loss coefficient, further leading to the declined advection effects on heat exchange. It is shown that the thermal performance of smooth U-tube at different velocities is always better than the petals type. Finally future design of guidelines is given in discussion. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 117
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BP STAT REV 2016 CHI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DOEEIA0484
[3]   Reference data sets for vertical borehole ground heat exchanger models and thermal response test analysis [J].
Beier, Richard A. ;
Smith, Marvin D. ;
Spitler, Jeffrey D. .
GEOTHERMICS, 2011, 40 (01) :79-85
[4]   CFD applications in various heat exchangers design: A review [J].
Bhutta, Muhammad Mahmood Aslam ;
Hayat, Nasir ;
Bashir, Muhammad Hassan ;
Khan, Ahmer Rais ;
Ahmad, Kanwar Naveed ;
Khan, Sarfaraz .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 32 :1-12
[5]  
Bose J.E., 2002, 7 IEA HEAT PUMP C, V1, P324
[6]   Numerical investigation of a novel tube design for the geothermal borehole heat exchanger [J].
Bouhacina, Benamar ;
Saim, Rachid ;
Oztop, Hakan F. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 79 :153-162
[7]   Influence of turbulent boundary conditions on RANS simulations of pollutant dispersion in mechanically ventilated enclosures with transitional slot Reynolds number [J].
Cao, Shi-Jie ;
Meyers, Johan .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 59 :397-407
[8]   Simulation and experimental analysis of optimal buried depth of the vertical U-tube ground heat exchanger for a ground-coupled heat pump system [J].
Chen, Jinhua ;
Xia, Lei ;
Li, Baizhan ;
Mmereki, Daniel .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 73 :46-54
[9]   CFD simulations of horizontal ground heat exchangers: A comparison among different configurations [J].
Congedo, P. M. ;
Colangelo, G. ;
Starace, G. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 33-34 :24-32
[10]   Numerical analysis and experimental validation of heat transfer in ground heat exchangers in alternative operation modes [J].
Cui, P. ;
Yang, H. ;
Fang, Z. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2008, 40 (06) :1060-1066