Review on particle emissions during fused deposition modeling of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polylactic acid polymers

被引:33
作者
Aluri, Manoj [1 ]
Monami, Bhuyan [2 ]
Raj, Banik Swarup [3 ]
Mamilla, Ravi Sankar [4 ]
机构
[1] Rajiv Gandhi Univ Knowledge Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Basar 504107, Nirmal, India
[2] Assam Engn Coll, Dept Mech Engn, Gauhati 781013, Assam, India
[3] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Silchar 788010, India
[4] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Tirupati 517506, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
FDM; ABS; PLA; Health risks; Air filters; TOP 3D PRINTER; VOLATILE ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; ULTRAFINE PARTICLES; THERMAL-DECOMPOSITION; 3-D PRINTER; EXPOSURES; PARTICULATE; OPERATION; SAFETY; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.521
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As 3D printing technology is rapidly evolving, it?s impact on human health is becoming a prime concern. The major reason behind this is the emission of particles during the heating of thermoplastics used for 3D printing. Thermoplastics find very frequent applications in additive manufacturing processes. Fused Metal Deposition (FDM) is a 3D printing technique which is well known for its ability to produce complex geometries. However, the filaments used in this process, namely Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) and Polylactic Acid (PLA) generate emissions which are harmful to the human health and long term exposure to them could possibly lead to life-threatening conditions. Several factors lead to the concentration and impact of particle emissions such as process parameters, material used, chemical composition, etc. Comparative research works are also carried out to find the most suitable material for 3D printing as per output and emissions. The present paper presents a review on generation of particle emissions by the usage of ABS and PLA and the notable health risks caused by them. Also, the prevention techniques of such emissions are discussed in the subsections. @& nbsp;2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Materials, Processing & Characterization.
引用
收藏
页码:1375 / 1383
页数:9
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Aguilera G., 2016, CHARACTERIZATION PAR
[2]  
Aubin F., 2017, EVALUATION INNOVATIV
[3]  
Azimi P., EVALUATING CONTROLLI
[4]  
Azimi P., 2016, PILOT STUDY IMPACT P
[5]   Predicting Concentrations of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds Resulting from Desktop 3D Printer Operation and the Impact of Potential Control Strategies [J].
Azimi, Parham ;
Fazli, Torkan ;
Stephens, Brent .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 :S107-S119
[6]  
BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, 2012, TEST METHOD DETERMIN
[7]   Benefits and limitations of three-dimensional printing technology for ecological research [J].
Behm, Jocelyn E. ;
Waite, Brenna R. ;
Hsieh, S. Tonia ;
Helmus, Matthew R. .
BMC ECOLOGY, 2018, 18 :32
[8]   Three-Dimensional (3D) Printers in Libraries: Perspective and Preliminary Safety Analysis [J].
Bharti, Neelam ;
Singh, Shailendra .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 94 (07) :879-885
[9]   Addressing Hazardous Implications of Additive Manufacturing Complementing Life Cycle Assessment with a Framework for Evaluating Direct Human Health and Environmental Impacts [J].
Bours, Justin ;
Adzima, Brian ;
Gladwin, Susan ;
Cabral, Julia ;
Mau, Serena .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 :S25-S36
[10]  
Bravi L., 2019, Procedia Manufacturing, V41, DOI [10.1016/j.promfg.2019.10.020, DOI 10.1016/J.PROMFG.2019.10.020]