Ten years of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: Retrospect and prospect from the nephrologist's point of view

被引:13
作者
Rettkowski, O. [1 ]
Hamza, A. [1 ]
Markau, S. [1 ]
Osten, B. [1 ]
Fornara, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Urol & Kidney Transplant, D-06097 Halle, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.10.220
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The laparoscopic living kidney donor nephrectomy introduced in 1995 has become an accepted method of kidney harvest for transplantation. The method has proven its usefulness as well as its superiority compared to open donor nephrectomy. Based on the results of a decade, an overview from a nephrologist's point of view is presented here in; a view that is known to be quite different from (and sometimes contrary to) the surgeon's approach. While urologists and surgeons focus more on the technique and complication rates, the nephrologist tends to estimate the new procedure with regard to his dialysis patients' outcomes (ie, whether it will result in an increased number of kidney transplantations in the long term). The latter aspect has to be the benchmark in the estimation of the effects of this procedure; it is the ultimate goal of every surgery in kidney transplantation. The 10-year results are more than encouraging, but nevertheless it will take at least one more decade for a valid evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 33
页数:4
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy [J].
Alston, C ;
Spaliviero, M ;
Gill, IS .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (05) :833-839
[2]   Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy [J].
Brook, NR ;
Nicholson, ML .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (11) :1313-1314
[3]   Laparoscopic procurement of kidneys with multiple renal arteries is associated with increased ureteral complications in the recipient [J].
Carter, JT ;
Freise, CE ;
McTaggart, RA ;
Mahanty, HD ;
Kang, SM ;
Chan, SH ;
Feng, S ;
Roberts, JP ;
Posselt, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (06) :1312-1318
[4]   Living-donor kidney transplantation: A review of the current practices for the live donor [J].
Davis, CL ;
Delmonico, FL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 (07) :2098-2110
[5]   Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy [J].
Derweesh, IH ;
Goldfarb, DA ;
Abreu, SC ;
Goel, M ;
Flechner, SM ;
Modlin, C ;
Zhou, LM ;
Streem, SB ;
Novick, AC ;
Gill, IS .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (05) :862-866
[6]  
*DTG, 2003, VERSH LEB
[7]   Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive? [J].
Fornara, P ;
Doehn, C ;
Seyfarth, M ;
Jocham, D .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (03) :241-250
[8]   Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy in Germany:: Impact on donor health-related quality of life and willingness to donate [J].
Giessing, M ;
Reuter, S ;
Deger, S ;
Tüllmann, M ;
Hirte, I ;
Budde, K ;
Fritsche, L ;
Slowinski, T ;
Dragun, D ;
Neumayer, HH ;
Leoning, SA ;
Schönberger, B .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (05) :2011-2015
[9]   LAPAROSCOPIC LIVE-DONOR NEPHRECTOMY [J].
GILL, IS ;
CARBONE, JM ;
CLAYMAN, RV ;
FADDEN, PA ;
STONE, AM ;
LUCAS, BA ;
MCROBERTS, JW .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1994, 8 (02) :143-148
[10]   Fate of donor kidney: Laparoscopic versus open technique [J].
Goel, MC ;
Modlin, CS ;
Mottoo, AM ;
Derweesh, IH ;
Flechner, SM ;
Streem, S ;
Gill, I ;
Goldfarb, DA ;
Novick, AC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (06) :2326-2330