Valuing visitor services and access to protected areas: The case of Nyungwe National Park in Rwanda

被引:44
作者
Lal, Pankaj [1 ]
Wolde, Bernabas [1 ]
Masozera, Michel [2 ]
Burli, Pralhad [1 ]
Alavalapati, Janaki [3 ]
Ranjan, Aditi [4 ]
Montambault, Jensen [5 ]
Banerjee, Onil [6 ]
Ochuodho, Thomas [7 ]
Mugabo, Rodrigue [2 ]
机构
[1] Montclair State Univ, 1 Normal Ave, Montclair, NJ 07043 USA
[2] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Box 1699, Gasabo, Rwanda
[3] Auburn Univ, 3301 Forestry & Wildlife Bldg,602 Duncan Dr, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[4] MYMA Solut LLC, 35 Larsen Lane 1, Lincoln Pk, NJ 07035 USA
[5] Nature Conservancy, 490 Westfield Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22901 USA
[6] Interamer Dev Bank, 1300 New York Ave NW, Washington, DC 20577 USA
[7] Univ Kentucky, 223 Thomas Poe Cooper Bldg,730 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
关键词
Nyungwe National Park; Rwanda; Park entrance fees; Willingness to pay; Park use equity; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; PUBLIC LANDS; USER FEES; CONSERVATION; RECREATION; TOURISM; BIODIVERSITY; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tourman.2017.01.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Policymakers and recreation site managers use changes in fee structure, either introducing park entrance fees or increasing existing ones, to generate revenues, improve services, and reduce damages associated with over-use. Increase in park usage fee, however, can make the park inaccessible to certain segments of tourists. Understanding park users' response to changes in fees and its implication on park use equity is, thus, important to achieving a park's full potential in a socially and environmentally responsible way. This information is crucial especially for developing countries, where the issue has received relatively less attention and national park systems are chronically underfunded. This paper contributes to the literature on park access fees by: empirically assessing park use equity between and among international and national tourists visiting Nyungwe National Park, Rwanda, and; developing an approach for determining predictors and mean willingness to pay values for park entrance. Results of our survey-based approach show a positive willingness to pay values for park entrance and fee increases. Our results also show that it is possible to raise revenue without exacerbating existing park use differences. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 151
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, Sao Paulo State (Brazil) [J].
Adams, Cristina ;
da Motta, Ronaldo Seroa ;
Ortiz, Roman Arigoni ;
Reid, John ;
Aznar, Cristina Ebersbach ;
de Almeida Sinisgalli, Paulo Antonio .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (2-3) :359-370
[2]  
Agresti A, 2007, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA
[3]   Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: Implications for sustainable park finance and local development [J].
Baral, Nabin ;
Stern, Marc J. ;
Bhattarai, Ranju .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (2-3) :218-227
[4]   WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION [J].
Bhandari, Amit K. ;
Heshmati, Almas .
JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING, 2010, 27 (06) :612-623
[5]   The welfare costs of urban outdoor water restrictions [J].
Brennan, Donna ;
Tapsuwan, Sorada ;
Ingram, Gordon .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 51 (03) :243-261
[6]  
Buckley R., 2003, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, V11, P56, DOI 10.1080/09669580308667193
[7]   Factors influencing repeat visits to a destination: The influence of group composition [J].
Campo-Martinez, Sara ;
Garau-Vadell, Joan B. ;
Pilar Martinez-Ruiz, Maria .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 31 (06) :862-870
[8]  
Cessford GR, 2000, US FOR SERV RMRS-P, V3, P231
[9]   Contingent valuation of ecotourism development in country parks in the urban shadow [J].
Chen, Wendy Y. ;
Jim, C. Y. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2012, 19 (01) :44-53
[10]  
Cheung L. T. O., 2014, Journal of Ecotourism, V13, P35, DOI 10.1080/14724049.2014.941848