Remaining Useful Life Estimation for Predictive Maintenance Using Feature Engineering

被引:13
|
作者
Yurek, Ozlem Ece [1 ]
Birant, Derya [2 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Grad Sch Nat & Appl Sci, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Izmir, Turkey
来源
2019 INNOVATIONS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (ASYU) | 2019年
关键词
predictive maintenance; remaining useful life estimation; machine learning; feature engineering;
D O I
10.1109/asyu48272.2019.8946397
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recently, machine learning techniques have been used to produce increasingly effective solutions to predict the remaining useful life (RUL) of assets accurately. This paper investigates the effect of different feature engineering approaches to the accuracy of RUL prediction. In this study, six different feature selection methods and many different regression algorithms were applied to choose the most accurate final model for prediction. Applied feature selection algorithms are Chi Squared, Spearman Correlation, Mutual Information, Fisher Score, Pearson Correlation and Count Based. Machine learning algorithms used in this work are Linear Regression, Bayesian Linear Regression, Poisson Regression, Neural Network Regression, Boosted Decision Tree Regression and Decision Forest Regression. In addition, two different feature engineering approaches were also tested on the benchmark dataset by transforming its feature space, with the goal of improving predictive modelling performance. Each combination of these methods were applied and totally 72 different models were constructed and compared with each other to evaluate their performances in terms of five different metrics, including mean absolute error, root mean squared error, relative absolute error, relative squared error and coefficient of determination.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 218
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Remaining Useful Life Estimation on Turbofan Engines Using Joint Autoencoder-Regression
    Ince, Kursat
    Genc, Yakup
    2020 28TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2020,
  • [32] Remaining Useful Life Estimation in Prognostics Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
    Hu, Qiankun
    Zhao, Yongping
    Wang, Yuqiang
    Peng, Pei
    Ren, Lihua
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 32919 - 32934
  • [33] Adaptive Framework for Maintenance Scheduling Based on Dynamic Preventive Intervals and Remaining Useful Life Estimation
    Nunes, Pedro
    Rocha, Eugenio
    Santos, Jose
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [34] A Predictive Maintenance Strategy for Multi-Component Systems Based on Components' Remaining Useful Life Prediction
    Lv, Yaqiong
    Zheng, Pan
    Yuan, Jiabei
    Cao, Xiaohua
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (18)
  • [35] Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Rotating Machines using Octave Spectral Features
    Chelmiah, Eoghan T.
    McLoone, Violeta, I
    Kavanagh, Darren E.
    IECON 2020: THE 46TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2020, : 3031 - 3036
  • [36] Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Aircraft Engines Using Differentiable Architecture Search
    Mao, Pengli
    Lin, Yan
    Xue, Song
    Zhang, Baochang
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [37] Recurrent Neural Networks for Remaining Useful Life Estimation
    Heimes, Felix O.
    2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT (PHM), 2008, : 59 - 64
  • [38] Dynamic predictive maintenance strategy for system remaining useful life prediction via deep learning ensemble method
    Wang, Lubing
    Zhu, Zhengbo
    Zhao, Xufeng
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 245
  • [39] Prediction of remaining useful life using the CNN-GRU network: A study on maintenance management
    Azyus, Adryan Fitra
    Wijaya, Sastra Kusuma
    Naved, Mohd
    SOFTWARE IMPACTS, 2023, 17
  • [40] Remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems using vanilla LSTM neural networks
    Wu, Yuting
    Yuan, Mei
    Dong, Shaopeng
    Lin, Li
    Liu, Yingqi
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2018, 275 : 167 - 179